
Why: limited usage
vs PHI: allows 26.8 PPR/g to WR, rank 26/32 (Tough). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Small sample (2 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W9 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 3 | 3 | 24 | 0 | 51% | 10% | 5.4 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 54% | 7% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 1 | 1 | 33 | 1 | 38% | 4% | 10.3 |
| 2025 W5 | @ | 2 | 1 | 50 | 0 | 39% | 9% | 6.0 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 3 | 2 | 21 | 1 | 37% | 13% | 10.1 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 3 | 3 | 56 | 1 | 36% | 17% | 14.6 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 1 | 1 | 19 | 0 | 23% | 3% | 4.9 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W18 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 34% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W17 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W16 | vs | 3 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 13% | 8% | 2.3 |
| 2024 W15 | @ | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15% | 3% | 1.0 |
| 2024 W13 | vs | 2 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 29% | 7% | 3.3 |
| 2024 W12 | vs | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 26% | 3% | 1.8 |
| 2024 W11 | @ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30% | 3% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W10 | vs | 3 | 1 | 23 | 0 | 41% | 9% | 3.3 |
| 2024 W9 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 37% | 0% | 0.0 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 24 graded calls.
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade