



vs DAL: allows 39.2 PPR/g to WR, rank 1/32 (Soft). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W8. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Jacoby Brissett. 2025 share of pass targets to WR (212/520). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (WR44), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
Small sample (2 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
They are doing what they need to do to keep me up for the rest of the season." Among other snap count notes: -- Wide receiver Michael Wilson played 94 percent of the snaps, the second time in three games he hit that level and only the fourt
source ↗| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W7 | vs | 8 | 4 | 55 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 90% | 18% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W6 | @ | 7 | 4 | 32 | 0 | – | – | 92% | 21% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W5 | vs | 7 | 4 | 30 | 0 | – | – | 84% | 15% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W4 | @ | 13 | 7 | 95 | 0 | – | – | 94% | 37% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W3 | @ | 17 | 11 | 89 | 1 | – | – | 93% | 34% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W2 | vs | 7 | 2 | 18 | 0 | – | – | 94% | 27% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W1 | @ | 7 | 5 | 56 | 0 | – | – | 85% | 19% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W18 | @ | 8 | 5 | 99 | 1 | – | – | 93% | 29% | 20.9 | 18.4 | 15.9 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 10 | 5 | 89 | 1 | – | – | 86% | 29% | 19.9 | 17.4 | 14.9 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 3 | 2 | 52 | 1 | – | – | 86% | 10% | 13.2 | 12.2 | 11.2 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 11 | 5 | 54 | 1 | – | – | 85% | 29% | 16.4 | 13.9 | 11.4 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 16 | 11 | 142 | 2 | – | – | 79% | 36% | 37.2 | 31.7 | 26.2 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 7 | 3 | 36 | 0 | – | – | 93% | 19% | 6.6 | 5.1 | 3.6 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 15 | 10 | 118 | 0 | – | – | 82% | 33% | 21.8 | 16.8 | 11.8 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 18 | 15 | 185 | 0 | – | – | 82% | 32% | 33.5 | 26.0 | 18.5 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 7 | 4 | 34 | 0 | – | – | 92% | 16% | 7.4 | 5.4 | 3.4 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 4 | 3 | 61 | 0 | – | – | 72% | 14% | 9.1 | 7.6 | 6.1 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 4 | 3 | 40 | 0 | – | – | 82% | 12% | 7.0 | 5.5 | 4.0 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.