Loading…
Michael Wilson
WR · ARI
START
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: heavy usage
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
17.9
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs LAC: allows 26.9 PPR/g to WR, rank 24/32 (Tough). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs LAC
contextvs LAC: 1 game, 2.5 PPR avg
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W7 |  ARI | vs LAC | 3 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 2.5 |
Swipe for more →
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %93%
Target share29%
Opportunities8
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
101Average
#12 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
100Average
#16 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
101Average
#12 of 32 · 17 games
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- Love With Cardinals In Pads, And Camp Aftermathwww.azcardinals.com · 2026-07-28
- Pretty Good Day For Minshew And Brissett, And Camp Aftermathwww.azcardinals.com · 2026-07-26
- Cards WR Michael Wilson has 1,006 reasons for new ...www.espn.com · 2026-07-23
- Dart, Tate and others primed to follow path of 202...www.espn.com · 2026-07-22
- Top Questions Heading Into 2026 Training Camp, Part Twowww.azcardinals.com · 2026-07-21
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | @ LAR | 8 | 5 | 99 | 1 | – | – | 93% | 29% | 20.9 |
| 2025 W17 | @ CIN | 10 | 5 | 89 | 1 | – | – | 86% | 29% | 19.9 |
| 2025 W16 | vs ATL | 3 | 2 | 52 | 1 | – | – | 86% | 10% | 13.2 |
| 2025 W15 | @ HOU | 11 | 5 | 54 | 1 | – | – | 85% | 29% | 16.4 |
| 2025 W14 | vsLAR | 16 | 11 | 142 | 2 | – | – | 79% | 36% | 37.2 |
| 2025 W13 | @ TB | 7 | 3 | 36 | 0 | – | – | 93% | 19% | 6.6 |
| 2025 W12 | vs JAX | 15 | 10 | 118 | 0 | – | – | 82% | 33% | 21.8 |
| 2025 W11 | vs SF | 18 | 15 | 185 | 0 | – | – | 82% | 32% | 33.5 |
| 2025 W10 | @ SEA | 7 | 4 | 34 | 0 | – | – | 92% | 16% | 7.4 |
| 2025 W9 | @ DAL | 4 | 3 | 61 | 0 | – | – | 72% | 14% | 9.1 |
| 2025 W7 | vs GB | 4 | 3 | 40 | 0 | – | – | 82% | 12% | 7.0 |
| 2025 W6 | @ IND | 5 | 4 | 44 | 0 | – | – | 75% | 13% | 8.4 |
| 2025 W5 | vs TEN | 4 | 2 | 16 | 0 | – | – | 69% | 13% | 3.6 |
| 2025 W4 | vsSEA | 6 | 3 | 15 | 0 | – | – | 97% | 15% | 4.5 |
| 2025 W3 | @SF | 2 | 1 | 5 | 0 | – | – | 74% | 6% | 1.5 |
| 2025 W2 | vs CAR | 2 | 1 | 11 | 1 | – | – | 69% | 8% | 8.1 |
| 2025 W1 | @ NO | 4 | 1 | 5 | 0 | – | – | 67% | 14% | 1.5 |
| 2024 W17 | @LAR | 6 | 4 | 22 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 87% | 13% | 6.9 |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim91%hit rate
33 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🟢 67%
of 6 Start calls
🟡 100%
of 1 Flex call
🔴 96%
of 26 Sit calls
Based on 33 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | LAR | START | 15.3 | WR6 (20.9) | ✓ |
| 2025 W17 | CIN | START | 14.5 | WR8 (19.9) | ✓ |
| 2025 W16 | ATL | START | 16.9 | WR25 (13.2) | ✗ |
| 2025 W15 | HOU | START | 17.9 | WR17 (16.4) | ✓ |
| 2025 W14 | LAR | START | 15.0 | WR1 (37.2) | ✓ |
| 2025 W13 | TB | START | 14.6 | WR51 (6.6) | ✗ |
| 2025 W12 | JAX | FLEX | 12.1 | WR9 (21.8) | ✓ |
| 2025 W11 | SF | SIT | 8.6 | WR1 (33.5) | ✗ |
| 2025 W10 | SEA | SIT | 7.4 | WR44 (7.4) | ✓ |
| 2025 W9 | DAL | SIT | 8.2 | WR43 (9.1) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade