Loading…
Mark Andrews
TE · BAL
SIT
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: limited usage
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
26.0
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs IND: allows 15.1 PPR/g to TE, rank 7/32 (Soft). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs IND
contextvs IND: 1 game, 7.5 PPR avg
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 W3 |  BAL | vs IND | 5 | 4 | 35 | 0 | 7.5 |
Swipe for more →
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %59%
Target share19%
Opportunities3
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
107Easy
#3 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
127Easy
#2 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
107Easy
#3 of 32 · 17 games
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- Baltimore Ravens 2026 preview: Why Lamar Jackson and Trey Hendrickson fuel optimismwww.pff.com · 2026-07-28
- Stacking the most impactful NFL offseason moves: 5...www.espn.com · 2026-07-28
- Cade Otton’s Polarizing Playwww.pewterreport.com · 2026-07-27
- PFF Tight End Rankings: The top 32 players ahead of the 2026 NFL seasonwww.pff.com · 2026-07-22
- Mock draft: Non-PPR formats are a throwback to run...www.espn.com · 2026-07-20
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | @ PIT | 3 | 2 | 14 | 0 | – | – | 59% | 19% | 3.4 |
| 2025 W17 | @ GB | 4 | 4 | 28 | 0 | – | – | 41% | 20% | 6.8 |
| 2025 W16 | vs NE | 3 | 2 | 21 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 44% | 15% | 4.4 |
| 2025 W15 | @ CIN | 3 | 2 | 18 | 0 | – | – | 41% | 25% | 3.8 |
| 2025 W14 | vsPIT | 5 | 1 | 9 | 0 | – | – | 68% | 16% | 1.9 |
| 2025 W13 | vsCIN | 6 | 4 | 47 | 0 | – | – | 68% | 20% | 8.7 |
| 2025 W12 | vs NYJ | 3 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 67% | 15% | 2.1 |
| 2025 W11 | @ CLE | 5 | 3 | 32 | 0 | 1 | 35 | 61% | 20% | 15.7 |
| 2025 W10 | @ MIN | 5 | 3 | 14 | 1 | – | – | 63% | 17% | 10.4 |
| 2025 W9 | @ MIA | 3 | 2 | 22 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50% | 13% | 16.6 |
| 2025 W8 | vs CHI | 3 | 3 | 34 | 0 | – | – | 60% | 14% | 6.4 |
| 2025 W6 | vs LAR | 6 | 4 | 24 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 78% | 19% | 6.6 |
| 2025 W5 | vs HOU | 3 | 2 | 22 | 0 | – | – | 58% | 15% | 4.2 |
| 2025 W4 | @ KC | 8 | 7 | 30 | 0 | – | – | 56% | 27% | 10.0 |
| 2025 W3 | vs DET | 6 | 6 | 91 | 2 | – | – | 81% | 21% | 27.1 |
| 2025 W2 | vsCLE | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 80% | 11% | 1.4 |
| 2025 W1 | @ BUF | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | – | – | 75% | 5% | 1.5 |
| 2024 W18 | vsCLE | 8 | 4 | 54 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 79% | 28% | 15.4 |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim35%hit rate
34 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🟢 0%
of 1 Start call
🟡 33%
of 18 Flex calls
🔴 40%
of 15 Sit calls
Based on 34 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | PIT | FLEX | 7.1 | TE37 (3.4) | ✗ |
| 2025 W17 | GB | SIT | 7.3 | TE25 (6.8) | ✓ |
| 2025 W16 | NE | SIT | 7.8 | TE35 (4.4) | ✓ |
| 2025 W15 | CIN | FLEX | 8.8 | TE38 (3.8) | ✗ |
| 2025 W14 | PIT | FLEX | 9.0 | TE45 (1.9) | ✗ |
| 2025 W13 | CIN | FLEX | 9.2 | TE17 (8.7) | ✗ |
| 2025 W12 | NYJ | FLEX | 8.9 | TE38 (2.1) | ✗ |
| 2025 W11 | CLE | SIT | 8.4 | TE5 (15.7) | ✗ |
| 2025 W10 | MIN | SIT | 8.0 | TE9 (10.4) | ✗ |
| 2025 W9 | MIA | FLEX | 8.8 | TE5 (16.6) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade