
Why: limited usage
vs NO: allows 12.5 PPR/g to TE, rank 19/32 (Average). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Lamar Jackson. 2025 share of pass targets to TE (124/404). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (TE7), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
No prior games vs NO in the record.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | @ | 6 | 4 | 49 | 0 | – | – | 0% | 25% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W18 | @ | 3 | 2 | 14 | 0 | – | – | 59% | 19% | 3.4 | 2.4 | 1.4 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 4 | 4 | 28 | 0 | – | – | 41% | 20% | 6.8 | 4.8 | 2.8 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 3 | 2 | 21 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 44% | 15% | 4.4 | 3.4 | 2.4 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 3 | 2 | 18 | 0 | – | – | 41% | 25% | 3.8 | 2.8 | 1.8 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 5 | 1 | 9 | 0 | – | – | 68% | 16% | 1.9 | 1.4 | 0.9 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 6 | 4 | 47 | 0 | – | – | 68% | 20% | 8.7 | 6.7 | 4.7 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 3 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 67% | 15% | 2.1 | 1.6 | 1.1 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 5 | 3 | 32 | 0 | 1 | 35 | 61% | 20% | 15.7 | 14.2 | 12.7 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 5 | 3 | 14 | 1 | – | – | 63% | 17% | 10.4 | 8.9 | 7.4 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 3 | 2 | 22 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50% | 13% | 16.6 | 15.6 | 14.6 |
| 2025 W8 | vs | 3 | 3 | 34 | 0 | – | – | 60% | 14% | 6.4 | 4.9 | 3.4 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 6 | 4 | 24 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 78% | 19% | 6.6 | 4.6 | 2.6 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 3 | 2 | 22 | 0 | – | – | 58% | 15% | 4.2 | 3.2 | 2.2 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 8 | 7 | 30 | 0 | – | – | 56% | 27% | 10.0 | 6.5 | 3.0 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 6 | 6 | 91 | 2 | – | – | 81% | 21% | 27.1 | 24.1 | 21.1 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 80% | 11% | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.4 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | – | – | 75% | 5% | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 34 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | FLEX | 7.1 | TE37 (3.4) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 7.3 | TE25 (6.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 7.8 | TE35 (4.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | FLEX | 8.8 | TE38 (3.8) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W14 | FLEX | 9.0 | TE45 (1.9) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W13 | FLEX | 9.2 | TE17 (8.7) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W12 | FLEX | 8.9 | TE38 (2.1) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 8.4 | TE5 (15.7) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 8.0 | TE9 (10.4) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W9 | FLEX | 8.8 | TE5 (16.6) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade