
Why: form-driven
vs ATL: allows 21.4 PPR/g to RB, rank 18/32 (Average). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
| Game | As | Site | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W1 | @ | 2 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 4.0 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs | 14 | 66 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 33 | 0 | 37% | 12% | 14.9 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 12 | 64 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32% | 0% | 6.4 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 14 | 143 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 49% | 5% | 29.1 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 12 | 33 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 15 | 0 | 45% | 11% | 7.8 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 8 | 13 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 49 | 1 | 50% | 9% | 15.2 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 10 | 35 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 56% | 18% | 12.4 |
| 2025 W12 | @ | 18 | 68 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50% | 0% | 12.8 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 10 | 62 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 28% | 7% | 8.7 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 14 | 70 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 21 | 0 | 46% | 7% | 11.1 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 16 | 31 | 2 | 2 | 2 | -2 | 0 | 56% | 6% | 16.9 |
| 2025 W8 | vs | 13 | 62 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 62% | 10% | 9.3 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 16 | 127 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 31 | 0 | 65% | 16% | 19.8 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 11 | 52 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 53% | 7% | 8.3 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 18 | 47 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 34 | 0 | 80% | 27% | 13.1 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 14 | 48 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 86 | 0 | 58% | 13% | 17.4 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 11 | 37 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 22 | 1 | 45% | 7% | 13.9 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 6 | 21 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 38% | 3% | 2.1 |
| 2024 W17 | vs | 11 | 71 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 41 | 0 | 53% | 18% | 16.2 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 31 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | FLEX | 10.9 | RB14 (14.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | FLEX | 12.1 | RB37 (6.4) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W16 | FLEX | 11.0 | RB5 (29.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 10.9 | RB36 (7.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | FLEX | 10.0 | RB16 (15.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | FLEX | 11.0 | RB23 (12.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | FLEX | 11.0 | RB18 (12.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | START | 14.0 | RB32 (8.7) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W10 | FLEX | 12.7 | RB23 (11.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | START | 13.6 | RB9 (16.9) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade