
Why: limited usage
vs TB: allows 22.1 PPR/g to RB, rank 14/32 (Average). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
| Game | As | Site | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W9 | vs | 1 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 25 | 1 | 13.5 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs | 8 | 42 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 49% | 11% | 8.2 |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 3 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 31% | 3% | 8.3 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 7 | 25 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 16 | 0 | 39% | 10% | 12.1 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 14 | 42 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 45% | 3% | 5.3 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 6 | 31 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 37% | 3% | 4.8 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 14 | 39 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 40% | 5% | 5.4 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1% | 0% | 0.5 |
| 2025 W8 | vs | 9 | 94 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 42% | 3% | 17.0 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 7 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 37% | 0% | 3.1 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 6 | 16 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 16 | 0 | 46% | 8% | 5.2 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 4 | 27 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 47% | 5% | 4.9 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 31% | 5% | 0.4 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 4 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27% | 0% | 0.1 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 25% | 9% | 2.6 |
| 2024 W18 | @ | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 38% | 6% | 2.4 |
| 2024 W17 | @ | 2 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 19% | 5% | 4.9 |
| 2024 W16 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 50 | 0 | 19% | 7% | 8.0 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 32 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 8.6 | RB26 (8.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 9.6 | RB27 (8.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 6.4 | RB25 (12.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 7.1 | RB46 (5.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 7.2 | RB45 (4.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 6.6 | RB49 (5.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | FLEX | 8.7 | RB62 (0.5) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W8 | SIT | 6.7 | RB14 (17.0) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W7 | SIT | 5.3 | RB49 (3.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W6 | SIT | 3.5 | RB39 (5.2) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade