
Why: heavy usage
vs DAL: allows 39.2 PPR/g to WR, rank 1/32 (Soft). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Small sample (3 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W4 | vs | 3 | 2 | 20 | 0 | – | – | 33% | 15% | 4.0 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 7 | 2 | 13 | 0 | – | – | 92% | 23% | 3.3 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 13 | 9 | 167 | 2 | – | – | 99% | 33% | 37.7 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 12 | 5 | 71 | 0 | – | – | 94% | 38% | 12.1 |
| 2024 W18 | @ | 8 | 5 | 64 | 1 | – | – | 70% | 29% | 17.4 |
| 2024 W17 | vs | 8 | 7 | 171 | 2 | – | – | 84% | 36% | 36.1 |
| 2024 W16 | @ | 14 | 7 | 68 | 0 | – | – | 90% | 38% | 13.8 |
| 2024 W15 | vs | 14 | 10 | 82 | 1 | – | – | 94% | 41% | 24.2 |
| 2024 W14 | vs | 10 | 5 | 79 | 0 | – | – | 94% | 22% | 14.9 |
| 2024 W13 | @ | 13 | 8 | 69 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 95% | 41% | 15.3 |
| 2024 W12 | vs | 9 | 6 | 64 | 0 | – | – | 93% | 30% | 12.4 |
| 2024 W10 | @ | 10 | 6 | 50 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 88% | 31% | 10.8 |
| 2024 W9 | vs | 11 | 9 | 59 | 0 | – | – | 95% | 42% | 14.9 |
| 2024 W8 | @ | 13 | 7 | 71 | 0 | – | – | 99% | 35% | 14.1 |
| 2024 W7 | vs | 8 | 4 | 41 | 0 | – | – | 93% | 30% | 8.1 |
| 2024 W4 | vs | 15 | 12 | 115 | 0 | 1 | -4 | 90% | 40% | 23.1 |
| 2024 W3 | @ | 12 | 8 | 78 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 85% | 36% | 28.2 |
| 2024 W2 | @ | 18 | 10 | 127 | 1 | – | – | 89% | 67% | – |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 17 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W4 | START | 15.2 | WR76 (4.0) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W3 | START | 17.9 | WR88 (3.3) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W2 | START | 16.6 | WR2 (37.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W1 | START | 17.8 | WR28 (12.1) | ✗ | |
| 2024 W18 | START | 17.2 | WR17 (17.4) | ✓ | |
| 2024 W17 | START | 16.6 | WR2 (36.1) | ✓ | |
| 2024 W16 | START | 15.9 | WR29 (13.8) | ✗ | |
| 2024 W15 | FLEX | 13.9 | WR9 (24.2) | ✓ | |
| 2024 W14 | START | 15.2 | WR25 (14.9) | ✗ | |
| 2024 W13 | START | 14.8 | WR26 (15.3) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade