
Why: limited usage
vs NO: allows 20.7 PPR/g to RB, rank 20/32 (Average). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
No prior games vs NO in the record.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W17 | vs | 9 | 32 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 35% | 0% | 3.2 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 8 | 34 | 0 | 7 | 6 | 41 | 0 | 73% | 32% | 13.5 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 11 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 46% | 0% | 2.1 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 9 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33% | 0% | 3.0 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 3 | 16 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 30% | 6% | 5.3 |
| 2025 W8 | vs | 12 | 58 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 58% | 0% | 5.8 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 15 | 57 | 1 | 2 | 1 | -3 | 0 | 56% | 6% | 12.4 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 12 | 51 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 77% | 11% | 6.1 |
| 2025 W5 | @ | 7 | 36 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 63% | 8% | 8.6 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 7 | 35 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 13 | 1 | 37% | 9% | 12.8 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 10 | 45 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 56% | 3% | 5.8 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 10 | 22 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 58% | 7% | 3.9 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 5 | 25 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 51% | 8% | 4.8 |
| 2024 W17 | @ | 6 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32% | 0% | 1.8 |
| 2024 W16 | vs | 9 | 26 | 0 | 2 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 35% | 5% | 3.5 |
| 2024 W15 | @ | 13 | 32 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 37% | 3% | 5.7 |
| 2024 W14 | vs | 14 | 55 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 46% | 11% | 8.1 |
| 2024 W13 | vs | 7 | 44 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 37% | 2% | 5.9 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 20 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 6.6 | RB52 (3.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 6.7 | RB21 (13.5) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 8.5 | RB62 (2.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 9.7 | RB54 (3.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | FLEX | 11.9 | RB51 (5.3) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W8 | FLEX | 12.3 | RB36 (5.8) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W7 | FLEX | 11.3 | RB17 (12.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W6 | SIT | 10.1 | RB35 (6.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W5 | FLEX | 9.4 | RB31 (8.6) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W4 | SIT | 7.8 | RB23 (12.8) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade