
Why: heavy usage, soft matchup
vs CAR: allows 27.1 PPR/g to WR, rank 23/32 (Tough). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Michael Penix Jr.. 2025 share of pass targets to WR (226/472). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (WR12), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
Small sample (6 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
Chris Olave isn’t participating in team drills as they negotiate a new contract — Nick Underhill (@nick_underhill) July 29, 2026 Falcons wideout Drake London, another member of the 2022 draft class, signed a four-year contract worth $35.3M
source ↗Chris Olave isn’t participating in team drills as they negotiate a new contract — Nick Underhill (@nick_underhill) July 29, 2026 Falcons wideout Drake London, another member of the 2022 draft class, signed a four-year contract worth $35.3M
source ↗| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | @ | 4 | 2 | 29 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0% | 21% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W18 | vs | 8 | 4 | 78 | 1 | – | – | 94% | 27% | 17.8 | 15.8 | 13.8 |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | – | – | 98% | 10% | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.4 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 8 | 3 | 27 | 0 | – | – | 69% | 24% | 5.7 | 4.2 | 2.7 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 9 | 7 | 119 | 0 | – | – | 92% | 31% | 18.9 | 15.4 | 11.9 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 8 | 6 | 104 | 1 | – | – | 98% | 32% | 24.4 | 21.4 | 18.4 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 14 | 9 | 118 | 3 | – | – | 98% | 41% | 38.8 | 34.3 | 29.8 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 10 | 4 | 42 | 0 | – | – | 98% | 28% | 8.2 | 6.2 | 4.2 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 16 | 10 | 158 | 1 | – | – | 97% | 52% | 31.8 | 26.8 | 21.8 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 10 | 8 | 110 | 1 | – | – | 85% | 39% | 25.0 | 21.0 | 17.0 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 8 | 5 | 55 | 0 | – | – | 86% | 20% | 10.5 | 8.0 | 5.5 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 4 | 3 | 49 | 0 | – | – | 85% | 19% | 5.9 | 4.4 | 2.9 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 15 | 8 | 55 | 0 | – | – | 88% | 36% | 13.5 | 9.5 | 5.5 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 18 | 10 | 187 | 2 | – | – | 99% | 49% | 40.7 | 35.7 | 30.7 |
| 2024 W17 | @ | 13 | 7 | 106 | 0 | – | – | 97% | 37% | 17.6 | 14.1 | 10.6 |
| 2024 W16 | vs | 8 | 5 | 59 | 0 | – | – | 73% | 31% | 10.9 | 8.4 | 5.9 |
| 2024 W15 | @ | 3 | 3 | 53 | 1 | – | – | 98% | 19% | 14.3 | 12.8 | 11.3 |
| 2024 W14 | @ | 10 | 5 | 70 | 0 | – | – | 100% | 27% | 12.0 | 9.5 | 7.0 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 29 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | START | 12.5 | WR11 (17.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | START | 16.8 | WR111 (1.4) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W16 | START | 18.0 | WR67 (5.7) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W11 | START | 19.9 | WR11 (18.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | START | 20.1 | WR1 (24.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | START | 16.7 | WR1 (38.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W7 | START | 16.0 | WR40 (8.2) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W6 | START | 14.0 | WR2 (31.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W4 | START | 16.3 | WR5 (25.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W3 | START | 18.0 | WR35 (10.5) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade