
Why: projected outside startable range
vs NYG: allows 33.4 PPR/g to WR, rank 9/32 (Soft). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W14 | @ | 7 | 4 | 51 | 0 | 9.1 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs | 7 | 5 | 34 | 0 | – | – | 84% | 16% | 8.4 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 9 | 3 | 21 | 0 | – | – | 82% | 24% | 5.1 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 3 | 1 | 6 | 0 | – | – | 42% | 8% | 1.6 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 1 | 1 | 19 | 1 | – | – | 52% | 4% | 8.9 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 31% | 3% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 3 | 2 | 22 | 0 | – | – | 61% | 8% | 4.2 |
| 2025 W5 | @ | 3 | 1 | 9 | 0 | – | – | 53% | 7% | 1.9 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | – | – | 26% | 3% | 1.9 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 13% | 3% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 36% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W18 | @ | 8 | 3 | 33 | 0 | – | – | 70% | 21% | 6.3 |
| 2024 W17 | vs | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 78% | 6% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W15 | vs | 7 | 2 | 64 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 78% | 24% | 8.8 |
| 2024 W14 | @ | 7 | 4 | 51 | 0 | – | – | 71% | 23% | 9.1 |
| 2024 W13 | vs | 3 | 2 | 36 | 1 | – | – | 76% | 9% | 11.6 |
| 2024 W11 | vs | 4 | 2 | 87 | 1 | – | – | 65% | 14% | 16.7 |
| 2024 W10 | vs | 3 | 3 | 109 | 2 | – | – | 55% | 14% | 25.9 |
| 2024 W9 | @ | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | – | – | 41% | 4% | 1.5 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 24 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 5.1 | WR33 (8.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 3.8 | WR63 (5.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 4.3 | WR107 (1.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 3.6 | WR43 (8.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 3.0 | WR105 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W6 | SIT | 2.3 | WR72 (4.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W5 | SIT | 3.2 | WR90 (1.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W3 | SIT | 4.3 | WR104 (1.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W2 | SIT | 6.7 | WR109 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W1 | SIT | 9.1 | WR105 (0.0) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade