Loading…
Kylen Granson
TE · TEN
SIT
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: limited usage
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
20.5
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs NYJ: allows 14.3 PPR/g to TE, rank 11/32 (Average). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs NYJ
contextvs NYJ: 1 game, 1.4 PPR avg
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W11 |  IND· prior | @ NYJ | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1.4 |
Swipe for more →
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %77%
Target share15%
Opportunities5
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
104Easy
#6 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
107Easy
#9 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
104Easy
#6 of 32 · 17 games
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- Titans TE Gunnar Helm eyes an even bigger second seasonwww.nbcsports.com · 2026-07-10
- 2026 Positional Spending Rankings: Tight Endsnfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-06
- Barnwell presents the 'Domestic Cup of American Fo...www.espn.com · 2026-07-02
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs WSH | 5 | 4 | 30 | 0 | 77% | 15% | 7.0 |
| 2025 W17 | @ BUF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W16 | @WSH | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W15 | vs LV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W14 | @ LAC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W13 | vs CHI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W12 | @ DAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W11 | vs DET | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 21% | 7% | 1.4 |
| 2025 W10 | @ GB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W8 | vs NYG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W7 | @ MIN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 34% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W6 | @NYG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W5 | vs DEN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 36% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W4 | @ TB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W3 | vs LAR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W2 | @ KC | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 57% | 5% | 1.5 |
| 2025 W1 | vsDAL | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 27% | 5% | 1.1 |
| 2024 W18 | vs JAX | 4 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 41% | 10% | 1.7 |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim100%hit rate
34 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🔴 100%
of 34 Sit calls
Based on 34 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | WSH | SIT | 0.2 | TE24 (7.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W17 | BUF | SIT | 0.0 | TE71 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W16 | WSH | SIT | 0.3 | TE73 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W15 | LV | SIT | 0.7 | TE73 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W14 | LAC | SIT | 0.8 | TE68 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W13 | CHI | SIT | 1.0 | TE74 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W12 | DAL | SIT | 1.2 | TE65 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W11 | DET | SIT | 0.6 | TE49 (1.4) | ✓ |
| 2025 W10 | GB | SIT | 0.7 | TE61 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W8 | NYG | SIT | 0.6 | TE60 (0.0) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade