
Why: projected outside startable range
vs ATL: allows 33.2 PPR/g to WR, rank 10/32 (Soft). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Bryce Young. 2025 share of pass targets to WR (274/464). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (WR79), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
Small sample (3 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
(Zietlow) - Carolina WR Xavier Legette will be in a boot through Thursday and will miss the joint practices, per Mike Kaye.
source ↗(Zietlow) - Carolina WR Xavier Legette will be in a boot through Thursday and will miss the joint practices, per Mike Kaye.
source ↗| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | vs | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 0% | 6% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W18 | @ | 4 | 3 | 22 | 0 | – | – | 31% | 13% | 5.2 | 3.7 | 2.2 |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | – | – | 55% | 5% | 1.3 | 0.8 | 0.3 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 3 | 1 | 12 | 0 | – | – | 65% | 10% | 2.2 | 1.7 | 1.2 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 3 | 2 | 39 | 0 | – | – | 74% | 15% | 5.9 | 4.9 | 3.9 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | – | – | 67% | 10% | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.1 |
| 2025 W12 | @ | 5 | 3 | 22 | 0 | – | – | 67% | 19% | 5.2 | 3.7 | 2.2 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 8 | 4 | 83 | 1 | – | – | 55% | 18% | 18.3 | 16.3 | 14.3 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 70% | 4% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 3 | 1 | 22 | 0 | – | – | 55% | 16% | 3.2 | 2.7 | 2.2 |
| 2025 W8 | vs | 3 | 2 | 17 | 0 | – | – | 89% | 13% | 3.7 | 2.7 | 1.7 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 11 | 9 | 92 | 1 | – | – | 80% | 36% | 24.2 | 19.7 | 15.2 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 2 | 2 | 11 | 0 | – | – | 73% | 10% | 3.1 | 2.1 | 1.1 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 3 | 2 | 31 | 1 | – | – | 79% | 11% | 11.1 | 10.1 | 9.1 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 8 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 80% | 15% | 0.8 | 0.3 | -0.2 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 7 | 3 | 10 | 0 | – | – | 78% | 21% | 4.0 | 2.5 | 1.0 |
| 2024 W18 | @ | 5 | 3 | 30 | 0 | – | – | 42% | 14% | 6.0 | 4.5 | 3.0 |
| 2024 W17 | @ | 9 | 5 | 28 | 0 | – | – | 68% | 41% | 7.8 | 5.3 | 2.8 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 29 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 5.0 | WR54 (5.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 6.0 | WR115 (1.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 8.0 | WR96 (2.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 7.1 | WR61 (5.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 7.0 | WR103 (1.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 7.1 | WR55 (5.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 8.3 | WR13 (18.3) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 9.1 | WR125 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 9.0 | WR70 (3.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W8 | SIT | 9.8 | WR68 (3.7) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade