Loading…
Jordan Mason
RB · MIN
SIT
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: limited usage
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
22.0
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs GB: allows 21.4 PPR/g to RB, rank 16/32 (Average). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs GB
contextvs GB: 3 games, 5.3 PPR avg (1 as SF, 2 as MIN)
Small sample (3 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %40%
Target share0%
Opportunities14
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
103Easy
#2 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
117Easy
#1 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
103Easy
#2 of 32 · 17 games
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- Mock draft: Non-PPR formats are a throwback to run...www.espn.com · 2026-07-20
- Mock draft: 12-team league can shift your quarterb...www.espn.com · 2026-07-13
- PFF Running Back Rankings: Assessing all 32 starters ahead of the 2026 NFL seasonwww.pff.com · 2026-07-08
- Fantasy Football: Running back sleepers for 2026 fantasy draftswww.pff.com · 2026-07-07
- Which NFL teams have the best -- and worst -- rost...www.espn.com · 2026-07-06
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs GB | 14 | 94 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40% | 0% | 9.4 |
| 2025 W16 | @ NYG | 2 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 7% | 4% | 2.1 |
| 2025 W15 | @ DAL | 10 | 29 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 36% | 0% | 2.9 |
| 2025 W14 | vs WSH | 11 | 52 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30% | 0% | 11.2 |
| 2025 W13 | @ SEA | 6 | 47 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 29% | 3% | 5.8 |
| 2025 W12 | @GB | 8 | 42 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27% | 0% | 4.2 |
| 2025 W11 | vs CHI | 6 | 45 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16% | 0% | 10.5 |
| 2025 W10 | vs BAL | 4 | 25 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 25% | 2% | 4.1 |
| 2025 W9 | @ DET | 10 | 36 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 60% | 4% | 4.7 |
| 2025 W8 | @ LAC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 35% | 3% | 1.6 |
| 2025 W7 | vs PHI | 15 | 57 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 77% | 0% | 11.7 |
| 2025 W5 | @ CLE | 13 | 52 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 66% | 12% | 12.6 |
| 2025 W4 | @ PIT | 16 | 57 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 15 | 0 | 62% | 7% | 10.2 |
| 2025 W3 | vs CIN | 16 | 116 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 60% | 0% | 23.6 |
| 2025 W2 | vs ATL | 9 | 30 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 60% | 14% | 5.8 |
| 2025 W1 | @CHI | 15 | 68 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 54% | 5% | 8.5 |
| 2024 W13 | @ BUF | 13 | 78 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 52% | 0% | 7.8 |
| 2024 W12 | @GB | 3 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 18% | 8% | 2.3 |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim50%hit rate
28 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🟢 25%
of 4 Start calls
🟡 40%
of 10 Flex calls
🔴 64%
of 14 Sit calls
Based on 28 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | GB | SIT | 6.2 | RB24 (9.4) | ✗ |
| 2025 W16 | NYG | SIT | 6.9 | RB59 (2.1) | ✓ |
| 2025 W15 | DAL | SIT | 6.6 | RB54 (2.9) | ✓ |
| 2025 W14 | WSH | SIT | 6.1 | RB24 (11.2) | ✗ |
| 2025 W13 | SEA | SIT | 5.5 | RB46 (5.8) | ✓ |
| 2025 W12 | GB | SIT | 5.8 | RB43 (4.2) | ✓ |
| 2025 W11 | CHI | FLEX | 8.8 | RB24 (10.5) | ✓ |
| 2025 W10 | BAL | FLEX | 10.2 | RB44 (4.1) | ✗ |
| 2025 W9 | DET | FLEX | 10.3 | RB39 (4.7) | ✗ |
| 2025 W8 | LAC | START | 13.7 | RB53 (1.6) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade