
Why: limited usage
vs SEA: allows 14.0 PPR/g to QB, rank 26/32 (Tough). Trailing QB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
No prior games vs SEA in the record.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 12.
QBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | C/A | Pass | PaTD | INT | RuYd | RuTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W15 | vs | 10/13 | 68 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.7 |
| 2024 W14 | vs | 0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 0.0 |
| 2024 W12 | vs | 21/31 | 189 | 0 | 0 | 32 | 0 | 10.8 |
| 2023 W18 | vs | 2/2 | 14 | 0 | 0 | – | – | – |
| 2023 W16 | @ | 9/16 | 55 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | – |
| 2023 W15 | @ | 20/34 | 177 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 0 | – |
| 2023 W14 | vs | 17/21 | 158 | 1 | 0 | 71 | 0 | – |
| 2023 W12 | vs | 17/25 | 191 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 0 | – |
| 2023 W11 | @ | 18/26 | 246 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 0 | – |
| 2023 W10 | @ | 14/27 | 86 | 2 | 1 | 41 | 0 | – |
| 2023 W9 | @ | 15/20 | 175 | 1 | 2 | 17 | 0 | – |
| 2023 W8 | vs | 2/7 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 1 | – |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Small sample: 3 graded calls. Read this as directional, not a reliable rate yet.
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade