
Why: limited usage, tough matchup
vs DAL: allows 39.2 PPR/g to WR, rank 1/32 (Soft). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Marcus Mariota. 2025 share of pass targets to WR (267/426). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (WR125), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
Small sample (4 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | @ | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 0% | 7% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W18 | vs | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | – | – | 13% | 3% | 1.8 | 1.3 | 0.8 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 9% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 8% | 0% | -1.6 | -1.6 | -1.6 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 9% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W12 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 6% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 27% | 5% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 37% | 4% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 7 | 3 | 25 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 60% | 21% | 5.9 | 4.4 | 2.9 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 4 | 2 | 50 | 0 | – | – | 30% | 9% | 7.0 | 6.0 | 5.0 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 5 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 64% | 12% | 4.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 4 | 2 | 15 | 0 | – | – | 66% | 16% | 3.5 | 2.5 | 1.5 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 3 | 2 | 7 | 0 | – | – | 33% | 8% | 2.7 | 1.7 | 0.7 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 7 | 5 | 57 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 80% | 17% | 17.6 | 15.1 | 12.6 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 4 | 3 | 52 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 71% | 14% | 8.8 | 7.3 | 5.8 |
| 2024 W18 | @ | 4 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 43% | 13% | 5.4 | 3.9 | 2.4 |
| 2024 W16 | vs | 5 | 4 | 56 | 0 | – | – | 66% | 14% | 7.6 | 5.6 | 3.6 |
| 2024 W15 | @ | 4 | 3 | 30 | 0 | – | – | 78% | 13% | 6.0 | 4.5 | 3.0 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 30 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 1.2 | WR88 (1.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 0.7 | WR139 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 1.7 | WR161 (-1.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 3.5 | WR126 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 5.1 | WR116 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 5.9 | WR124 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 6.9 | WR119 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 6.0 | WR58 (5.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W7 | SIT | 7.6 | WR56 (7.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W6 | SIT | 8.3 | WR77 (4.0) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade