
Why: limited usage
vs PIT: allows 19.4 PPR/g to RB, rank 25/32 (Tough). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Small sample (3 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | @ | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5% | 0% | 0.3 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 3 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8% | 0% | 0.9 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W12 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3% | 0% | 0.4 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 14% | 4% | 1.8 |
| 2025 W8 | vs | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8% | 0% | 0.2 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7% | 3% | 1.0 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7% | 0% | 0.6 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 8% | 5% | 1.5 |
| 2024 W17 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W16 | vs | 4 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10% | 0% | 2.2 |
| 2024 W15 | @ | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7% | 0% | 0.3 |
| 2024 W13 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W12 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W11 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3% | 0% | 0.0 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 27 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | -0.4 | RB75 (0.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 0.5 | RB70 (0.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | -0.4 | RB89 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 1.5 | RB82 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 1.6 | RB90 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 1.6 | RB76 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 2.6 | RB63 (0.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 2.5 | RB54 (1.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W8 | SIT | 2.8 | RB66 (0.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W4 | SIT | 1.7 | RB67 (1.0) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade