
Why: heavy usage, high-scoring game, soft matchup
vs NYG: allows 25.5 PPR/g to RB, rank 4/32 (Soft). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Matthew Stafford. 2025 share of pass targets to RB (64/578). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (RB19), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
| Game | As | Site | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 W17 | @ | 20 | 87 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 30.1 | 29.1 | 28.1 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
Kyren Williams is projected to lead the backfield in touches, but Sean McVay's offense gives Corum plenty of appeal.
source ↗Over/under: 44.1 (10th highest) Win probability: Seahawks 68% (8th highest) San Francisco 49ers @ Los Angeles Rams Projected score: Rams 29, 49ers 22 Lineup locks: Christian McCaffrey, Kyren Williams, Puka Nacua, Davante Adams Fantasy scoop
source ↗| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | vs | 11 | 41 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 24 | 0 | 64% | 11% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W18 | vs | 12 | 60 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 21 | 0 | 63% | 14% | 11.1 | 9.6 | 8.1 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 13 | 92 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 38 | 0 | 71% | 8% | 16.0 | 14.5 | 13.0 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 23 | 70 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 15 | 0 | 71% | 13% | 11.5 | 10.0 | 8.5 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 15 | 78 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 54% | 3% | 21.8 | 21.3 | 20.8 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 13 | 84 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 51% | 7% | 17.7 | 16.7 | 15.7 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 13 | 72 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 67% | 4% | 13.2 | 13.2 | 13.2 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 12 | 46 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 66% | 3% | 5.8 | 5.3 | 4.8 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 12 | 91 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 69% | 7% | 16.6 | 16.1 | 15.6 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 14 | 73 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 58% | 9% | 22.4 | 21.4 | 20.4 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 25 | 114 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 69% | 0% | 17.4 | 17.4 | 17.4 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 12 | 54 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 60% | 9% | 8.5 | 7.5 | 6.5 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 13 | 50 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 37 | 0 | 75% | 8% | 16.7 | 15.7 | 14.7 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 14 | 65 | 0 | 10 | 8 | 66 | 2 | 91% | 22% | 31.1 | 27.1 | 23.1 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 13 | 77 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 17 | 0 | 68% | 10% | 10.4 | 8.9 | 7.4 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 20 | 94 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 18 | 1 | 76% | 9% | 19.2 | 18.2 | 17.2 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 17 | 66 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 70% | 6% | 10.0 | 9.0 | 8.0 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 18 | 66 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 82% | 7% | 13.9 | 13.4 | 12.9 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 33 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | START | 16.2 | RB19 (11.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | START | 14.9 | RB15 (16.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | FLEX | 12.9 | RB26 (11.5) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W15 | FLEX | 13.8 | RB8 (21.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | START | 14.8 | RB8 (17.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | START | 15.5 | RB21 (13.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | START | 15.3 | RB37 (5.8) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W11 | START | 15.2 | RB15 (16.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | START | 17.2 | RB5 (22.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | START | 16.5 | RB8 (17.4) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade