
Why: OUT · INJ gate
vs MIA: allows 29.4 PPR/g to WR, rank 19/32 (Average). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Mac Jones. 2025 share of pass targets to WR (251/522). Descriptive context, never a model input.
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W1 | @ | 4 | 1 | 30 | 0 | 4.0 | 3.5 | 3.0 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
Wide receiver Christian Kirk’s first training camp practice as a 49er came to an early end and he will miss more time on Monday. Christian Kirk out of 49ers practice with a calf strain
source ↗Wide receiver Christian Kirk’s first training camp practice as a 49er came to an early end and he will miss more time on Monday. Christian Kirk out of 49ers practice with a calf strain
source ↗| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs | 2 | 1 | -3 | 0 | 57% | 7% | 0.7 | 0.2 | -0.3 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 45% | 19% | 2.1 | 1.1 | 0.1 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 5 | 3 | 37 | 0 | 62% | 15% | 6.7 | 5.2 | 3.7 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 3 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 36% | 11% | 1.6 | 1.1 | 0.6 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 49% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 6 | 5 | 54 | 1 | 32% | 21% | 16.4 | 13.9 | 11.4 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 4 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 51% | 10% | 1.6 | 1.1 | 0.6 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 43% | 7% | 1.3 | 0.8 | 0.3 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 8 | 4 | 26 | 0 | 56% | 21% | 6.6 | 4.6 | 2.6 |
| 2025 W5 | @ | 4 | 4 | 64 | 0 | 49% | 13% | 10.4 | 8.4 | 6.4 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 4 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 61% | 14% | 5.0 | 3.5 | 2.0 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 8 | 3 | 25 | 0 | 67% | 22% | 5.5 | 4.0 | 2.5 |
| 2024 W8 | vs | 5 | 2 | 59 | 0 | 65% | 17% | 7.9 | 6.9 | 5.9 |
| 2024 W7 | vs | 3 | 1 | 24 | 0 | 57% | 15% | 3.4 | 2.9 | 2.4 |
| 2024 W6 | @ | 6 | 3 | 39 | 0 | 74% | 17% | 6.9 | 5.4 | 3.9 |
| 2024 W5 | vs | 4 | 4 | 88 | 0 | 53% | 12% | 12.8 | 10.8 | 8.8 |
| 2024 W4 | @ | 12 | 7 | 61 | 1 | 78% | 38% | 19.1 | 15.6 | 12.1 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 21 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 5.1 | WR104 (0.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 3.5 | WR94 (2.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 5.0 | WR59 (6.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 5.9 | WR112 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 4.9 | WR87 (1.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 7.2 | WR114 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 6.2 | WR15 (16.4) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 7.0 | WR96 (1.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 8.2 | WR88 (1.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 8.2 | WR53 (6.6) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade