
Why: heavy usage, soft matchup




vs TEN: allows 21.4 PPR/g to RB, rank 17/32 (Average). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Jalen Hurts. 2025 share of pass targets to RB (69/463). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (RB10), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
No prior games vs TEN in the record.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | vs | 15 | 83 | 0 | 2 | 1 | -3 | 0 | 0% | 9% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 19 | 68 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 80% | 0% | 6.8 | 6.8 | 6.8 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 21 | 132 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 77% | 7% | 21.2 | 21.2 | 21.2 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 22 | 78 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 57% | 17% | 17.2 | 16.2 | 15.2 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 20 | 122 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 82% | 5% | 18.2 | 18.2 | 18.2 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 13 | 56 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 93% | 7% | 5.6 | 5.6 | 5.6 |
| 2025 W12 | @ | 10 | 22 | 0 | 8 | 7 | 52 | 0 | 83% | 22% | 12.4 | 8.9 | 5.4 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 26 | 83 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 81% | 7% | 10.0 | 9.5 | 9.0 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 22 | 60 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 41 | 0 | 70% | 13% | 13.1 | 11.6 | 10.1 |
| 2025 W8 | vs | 14 | 150 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 24 | 1 | 59% | 25% | 33.4 | 31.4 | 29.4 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 18 | 44 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 78% | 4% | 5.2 | 4.7 | 4.2 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 12 | 58 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 81% | 9% | 8.7 | 7.7 | 6.7 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 6 | 30 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 58 | 1 | 72% | 8% | 17.8 | 16.3 | 14.8 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 19 | 43 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 31 | 0 | 84% | 17% | 17.4 | 15.4 | 13.4 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 18 | 46 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 0 | 94% | 17% | 9.5 | 7.5 | 5.5 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 22 | 88 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 83% | 10% | 17.4 | 16.4 | 15.4 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 18 | 60 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 24 | 0 | 79% | 25% | 18.4 | 16.4 | 14.4 |
| 2024 W17 | vs | 31 | 167 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 75% | 11% | 18.9 | 17.9 | 16.9 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 32 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W17 | START | 15.8 | RB33 (6.8) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W16 | START | 15.7 | RB13 (21.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | START | 15.4 | RB12 (17.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | FLEX | 14.1 | RB7 (18.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | START | 16.7 | RB47 (5.6) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W12 | START | 15.9 | RB19 (12.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | START | 14.9 | RB27 (10.0) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W10 | START | 15.0 | RB20 (13.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W8 | START | 15.0 | RB3 (33.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W7 | START | 15.2 | RB40 (5.2) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade