
Why: OUT — INJ gate
vs LAR: allows 13.0 PPR/g to TE, rank 17/32 (Average). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Small sample (3 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
- George Kittle stays on top: Although Kittle is older and coming off a season-ending injury, he's still the best in the NFL. George Kittle, San Francisco 49ers Kittle is currently the gold standard when it comes to the tight end position.
source ↗| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs | 7 | 5 | 29 | 0 | – | – | 95% | 28% | 7.9 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 8 | 7 | 115 | 1 | – | – | 62% | 24% | 24.5 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 9 | 8 | 88 | 1 | – | – | 96% | 33% | 22.8 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 5 | 4 | 67 | 0 | – | – | 87% | 24% | 10.7 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 10 | 6 | 78 | 0 | – | – | 91% | 31% | 13.8 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 6 | 6 | 67 | 2 | – | – | 87% | 26% | 24.7 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 9 | 9 | 84 | 1 | – | – | 90% | 24% | 23.4 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 4 | 4 | 32 | 0 | 1 | -3 | 86% | 19% | 6.9 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 5 | 4 | 43 | 1 | – | – | 90% | 17% | 14.3 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 81% | 9% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 4 | 4 | 25 | 1 | – | – | 28% | 13% | 12.5 |
| 2024 W18 | @ | 3 | 2 | 27 | 0 | – | – | 29% | 8% | 4.7 |
| 2024 W17 | vs | 8 | 8 | 112 | 0 | – | – | 94% | 24% | 19.2 |
| 2024 W16 | @ | 9 | 8 | 106 | 0 | – | – | 98% | 27% | 18.6 |
| 2024 W15 | vs | 7 | 4 | 61 | 0 | – | – | 96% | 23% | 10.1 |
| 2024 W14 | vs | 6 | 6 | 151 | 0 | – | – | 85% | 25% | 21.1 |
| 2024 W13 | @ | 2 | 1 | 7 | 0 | – | – | 100% | 12% | 1.7 |
| 2024 W12 | @ | 6 | 6 | 82 | 1 | – | – | 84% | 24% | 20.2 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 26 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | START | 13.9 | TE17 (7.9) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W16 | START | 14.2 | TE1 (24.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | START | 13.7 | TE6 (22.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | START | 13.0 | TE15 (10.7) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W12 | START | 12.4 | TE6 (13.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | FLEX | 9.8 | TE2 (24.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 7.8 | TE2 (23.4) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 6.5 | TE28 (6.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W8 | SIT | 7.1 | TE8 (14.3) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W7 | FLEX | 9.6 | TE57 (0.0) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade