Loading…
Caleb Williams
QB · CHI
FLEX
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: heavy usage, high-scoring game
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
24.0
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs CAR: allows 13.9 PPR/g to QB, rank 27/32 (Tough). Trailing QB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs CAR
contextvs CAR: 1 game, 23.6 PPR avg
| Game | As | Site | C/A | Pass | PaTD | INT | RuYd | RuTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W5 |  CHI | vs CAR | 20/29 | 304 | 2 | 0 | 34 | 0 | 23.6 |
Swipe for more →
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %100%
Target share0%
Opportunities1
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
96Hard
#27 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
101Average
#12 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
96Hard
#27 of 32 · 17 games
QBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- Caleb Williams: We'll be more entertaining throughout the whole game this yearwww.nbcsports.com · 2026-07-28
- Jalon Daniels Camp Diary: Bringing Positive Energy To The Bucswww.pewterreport.com · 2026-07-28
- NFC Notes: Jordan Love, Caleb Williams, Bears, Lions, Packersnfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-28
- Looking Ahead To The 2027 Quarterback Carouselnfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-26
- Bucs’ Tristan Wirfs Gets 2026 NFL Top 100 Rankingwww.pewterreport.com · 2026-07-25
Game log
context| Week | Opp | C/A | Pass | PaTD | INT | RuYd | RuTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs DET | 20/33 | 212 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 16.6 |
| 2025 W17 | @ SF | 25/42 | 330 | 2 | 0 | 18 | 0 | 23.0 |
| 2025 W16 | vs GB | 19/34 | 250 | 2 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 21.0 |
| 2025 W15 | vs CLE | 17/28 | 242 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 19.0 |
| 2025 W14 | @GB | 19/35 | 186 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 14.9 |
| 2025 W13 | @ PHI | 17/36 | 154 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 9.5 |
| 2025 W12 | vs PIT | 19/35 | 239 | 3 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 21.7 |
| 2025 W11 | @ MIN | 16/32 | 193 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 0 | 10.3 |
| 2025 W10 | vs NYG | 20/36 | 220 | 1 | 0 | 63 | 1 | 25.1 |
| 2025 W9 | @ CIN | 20/34 | 280 | 3 | 0 | 53 | 0 | 38.7 |
| 2025 W8 | @ BAL | 25/38 | 285 | 0 | 1 | 24 | 0 | 11.8 |
| 2025 W7 | vs NO | 15/26 | 172 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 4.7 |
| 2025 W6 | @ WSH | 17/29 | 252 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 20.4 |
| 2025 W4 | @ LV | 22/37 | 212 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 11.8 |
| 2025 W3 | vs DAL | 19/28 | 298 | 4 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 29.1 |
| 2025 W2 | @DET | 19/30 | 207 | 2 | 1 | 27 | 0 | 17.0 |
| 2025 W1 | vsMIN | 21/35 | 210 | 1 | 0 | 58 | 1 | 24.2 |
| 2024 W18 | @GB | 21/29 | 148 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10.9 |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim44%hit rate
32 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🟢 67%
of 3 Start calls
🟡 35%
of 17 Flex calls
🔴 50%
of 12 Sit calls
Based on 32 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | DET | START | 18.7 | QB11 (16.6) | ✓ |
| 2025 W17 | SF | FLEX | 16.7 | QB7 (23.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W16 | GB | FLEX | 16.6 | QB8 (21.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W15 | CLE | FLEX | 16.1 | QB15 (19.0) | ✗ |
| 2025 W14 | GB | FLEX | 15.7 | QB16 (14.9) | ✗ |
| 2025 W13 | PHI | FLEX | 17.7 | QB25 (9.5) | ✗ |
| 2025 W12 | PIT | START | 19.1 | QB6 (21.7) | ✓ |
| 2025 W11 | MIN | FLEX | 18.0 | QB21 (10.3) | ✗ |
| 2025 W10 | NYG | FLEX | 18.0 | QB4 (25.1) | ✓ |
| 2025 W9 | CIN | FLEX | 17.1 | QB1 (38.7) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade