
Why: heavy usage, high-scoring game, soft matchup




vs MIN: allows 11.1 PPR/g to QB, rank 32/32 (Tough). Trailing QB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (QB9), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
Small sample (4 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
QBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
Five of his receptions came on third down, demonstrating the trust quarterback Caleb Williams quickly built with Raymond after he signed a one-year deal in March.
source ↗| Week | Opp | C/A | Pass | PaTD | INT | RuYd | RuTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | @ | 21/29 | 269 | 2 | 0 | 65 | 2 | – |
| 2025 W18 | vs | 20/33 | 212 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 16.6 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 25/42 | 330 | 2 | 0 | 18 | 0 | 23.0 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 19/34 | 250 | 2 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 21.0 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 17/28 | 242 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 19.0 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 19/35 | 186 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 14.9 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 17/36 | 154 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 9.5 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 19/35 | 239 | 3 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 21.7 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 16/32 | 193 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 0 | 10.3 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 20/36 | 220 | 1 | 0 | 63 | 1 | 25.1 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 20/34 | 280 | 3 | 0 | 53 | 0 | 38.7 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 25/38 | 285 | 0 | 1 | 24 | 0 | 11.8 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 15/26 | 172 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 4.7 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 17/29 | 252 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 20.4 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 22/37 | 212 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 11.8 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 19/28 | 298 | 4 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 29.1 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 19/30 | 207 | 2 | 1 | 27 | 0 | 17.0 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 21/35 | 210 | 1 | 0 | 58 | 1 | 24.2 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 32 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | START | 18.7 | QB11 (16.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | FLEX | 16.7 | QB7 (23.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | FLEX | 16.6 | QB8 (21.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | FLEX | 16.1 | QB15 (19.0) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W14 | FLEX | 15.7 | QB16 (14.9) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W13 | FLEX | 17.7 | QB25 (9.5) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W12 | START | 19.1 | QB6 (21.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | FLEX | 18.0 | QB21 (10.3) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W10 | FLEX | 18.0 | QB4 (25.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | FLEX | 17.1 | QB1 (38.7) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade