
Why: low total
vs LAC: allows 12.5 PPR/g to QB, rank 31/32 (Tough). Trailing QB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
| Game | As | Site | C/A | Pass | PaTD | INT | RuYd | RuTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W17 | vs | 1/2 | -2 | 0 | 0 | – | – | -0.1 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
QBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | C/A | Pass | PaTD | INT | RuYd | RuTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | @ | 22/31 | 243 | 2 | 1 | 19 | 0 | 15.6 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 21/37 | 212 | 2 | 0 | – | – | 16.5 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 16/31 | 203 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 10.6 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 27/40 | 249 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 20.6 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 25/44 | 271 | 2 | 1 | 22 | 0 | 19.0 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 29/40 | 301 | 2 | 1 | 16 | 0 | 19.6 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 33/49 | 317 | 1 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 18.7 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 47/57 | 452 | 2 | 2 | -2 | 0 | 21.9 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 22/44 | 258 | 2 | 0 | 31 | 0 | 19.4 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 21/31 | 261 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 24.8 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 25/36 | 279 | 2 | 0 | 26 | 0 | 19.8 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 27/44 | 320 | 2 | 1 | 19 | 0 | 20.7 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 0/1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 0.0 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.2 |
| 2024 W17 | vs | 1/2 | -2 | 0 | 0 | – | – | -0.1 |
| 2024 W13 | vs | 0/0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 0.0 |
| 2024 W8 | vs | 15/24 | 132 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 8.4 |
| 2024 W5 | vs | 18/34 | 160 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 7.4 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 22 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 14.2 | QB15 (15.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | FLEX | 16.5 | QB14 (16.5) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W16 | FLEX | 17.1 | QB24 (10.6) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 14.9 | QB12 (20.6) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W14 | FLEX | 16.0 | QB12 (19.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | FLEX | 16.8 | QB10 (19.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | FLEX | 17.7 | QB7 (18.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | FLEX | 17.8 | QB4 (21.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 12.9 | QB9 (19.4) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 10.7 | QB10 (24.8) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade