
Why: limited usage, low total
vs LAC: allows 26.9 PPR/g to WR, rank 24/32 (Tough). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W17 | vs | 4 | 2 | 22 | 0 | 4.2 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 52% | 4% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 1 | 1 | 25 | 0 | 26% | 3% | 3.5 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 5 | 3 | 27 | 0 | 70% | 15% | 5.7 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 3 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 45% | 11% | 3.7 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 34% | 5% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 1 | 1 | 19 | 0 | 68% | 3% | 2.9 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 2 | 2 | 34 | 0 | 73% | 10% | 5.4 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 4 | 3 | 44 | 0 | 79% | 14% | 7.4 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 2 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 78% | 9% | 3.4 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 9 | 5 | 142 | 0 | 80% | 25% | 19.2 |
| 2025 W5 | @ | 11 | 10 | 142 | 0 | 81% | 25% | 24.2 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 4 | 1 | 17 | 0 | 67% | 12% | 2.7 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 6 | 4 | 38 | 0 | 72% | 16% | 7.8 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 3 | 3 | 32 | 0 | 49% | 8% | 6.2 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 38% | 7% | 3.2 |
| 2024 W17 | vs | 4 | 2 | 22 | 0 | 72% | 17% | 4.2 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 28 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 4.6 | WR109 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 4.6 | WR81 (3.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 2.6 | WR66 (5.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 2.6 | WR79 (3.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 2.5 | WR109 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 5.3 | WR97 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 6.3 | WR109 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 8.6 | WR72 (2.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | FLEX | 11.6 | WR59 (5.4) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W8 | FLEX | 10.4 | WR51 (7.4) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade