
Why: projected outside startable range
vs ATL: allows 33.2 PPR/g to WR, rank 10/32 (Soft). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W10 | vs | 2 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 3.9 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
The Colts have not ruled out adding a veteran wide receiver following the offseason trade of Michael Pittman Jr.
source ↗| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | @ | 4 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 89% | 12% | 3.1 |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 3 | 2 | 16 | 0 | 86% | 10% | 3.6 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 5 | 4 | 32 | 0 | 93% | 14% | 7.2 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 5 | 3 | 26 | 0 | 93% | 19% | 5.6 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 12 | 9 | 79 | 0 | 87% | 33% | 16.9 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 4 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 83% | 16% | 2.3 |
| 2025 W12 | @ | 8 | 5 | 27 | 1 | 82% | 26% | 13.7 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 2 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 81% | 8% | 3.9 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 12 | 9 | 115 | 0 | 88% | 25% | 20.5 |
| 2025 W8 | vs | 9 | 8 | 95 | 1 | 79% | 32% | 23.5 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 9 | 7 | 58 | 1 | 87% | 28% | 20.8 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 3 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 85% | 10% | 4.0 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 6 | 5 | 39 | 1 | 82% | 20% | 14.9 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 10 | 5 | 41 | 1 | 93% | 31% | 15.1 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 6 | 6 | 73 | 1 | 81% | 24% | 19.3 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 5 | 4 | 40 | 0 | 83% | 15% | 8.0 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 8 | 6 | 80 | 1 | 82% | 28% | 20.0 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 10 | 6 | 72 | 0 | 91% | 26% | 13.2 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 33 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | FLEX | 9.3 | WR72 (3.1) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 10.5 | WR79 (3.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | FLEX | 11.4 | WR55 (7.2) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 9.7 | WR65 (5.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | FLEX | 10.7 | WR13 (16.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | FLEX | 13.0 | WR88 (2.3) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W12 | START | 13.6 | WR24 (13.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | START | 14.4 | WR62 (3.9) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W9 | FLEX | 13.2 | WR9 (20.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W8 | START | 13.3 | WR3 (23.5) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade