




vs CLE: allows 26.0 PPR/g to WR, rank 29/32 (Tough). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W8. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Aaron Rodgers. 2025 share of pass targets to WR (231/514). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (WR40), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
Small sample (2 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
The Colts have not ruled out adding a veteran wide receiver following the offseason trade of Michael Pittman Jr.
source ↗Roman Wilson (finger) and Ben Skowronek (calf) were ruled out earlier this week and Michael Pittman Jr.
source ↗| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W4 | @ | 4 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 72% | 10% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W3 | vs | 5 | 2 | 16 | 0 | 73% | 16% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W1 | vs | 3 | 3 | 58 | 0 | 88% | 8% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W18 | @ | 4 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 89% | 12% | 3.1 | 2.1 | 1.1 |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 3 | 2 | 16 | 0 | 86% | 10% | 3.6 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 5 | 4 | 32 | 0 | 93% | 14% | 7.2 | 5.2 | 3.2 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 5 | 3 | 26 | 0 | 93% | 19% | 5.6 | 4.1 | 2.6 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 12 | 9 | 79 | 0 | 87% | 33% | 16.9 | 12.4 | 7.9 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 4 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 83% | 16% | 2.3 | 1.8 | 1.3 |
| 2025 W12 | @ | 8 | 5 | 27 | 1 | 82% | 26% | 13.7 | 11.2 | 8.7 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 2 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 81% | 8% | 3.9 | 2.9 | 1.9 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 12 | 9 | 115 | 0 | 88% | 25% | 20.5 | 16.0 | 11.5 |
| 2025 W8 | vs | 9 | 8 | 95 | 1 | 79% | 32% | 23.5 | 19.5 | 15.5 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 9 | 7 | 58 | 1 | 87% | 28% | 20.8 | 17.3 | 13.8 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 3 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 85% | 10% | 4.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 6 | 5 | 39 | 1 | 82% | 20% | 14.9 | 12.4 | 9.9 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 10 | 5 | 41 | 1 | 93% | 31% | 15.1 | 12.6 | 10.1 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 6 | 6 | 73 | 1 | 81% | 24% | 19.3 | 16.3 | 13.3 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.