
Why: limited usage
vs NYJ: allows 30.2 PPR/g to WR, rank 18/32 (Average). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W2 | vs | 6 | 4 | 77 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 24.7 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W11 | vs | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | – | – | 2% | 3% | 2.3 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 1 | 1 | 18 | 0 | – | – | 10% | 3% | 2.8 |
| 2025 W5 | @ | 10 | 5 | 131 | 0 | – | – | 66% | 27% | 18.1 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 3 | 2 | 30 | 0 | – | – | 54% | 13% | 5.0 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 7 | 1 | 27 | 0 | – | – | 87% | 21% | 3.7 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 6 | 3 | 57 | 0 | – | – | 86% | 19% | 8.7 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 8 | 4 | 27 | 0 | – | – | 95% | 32% | 6.7 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 5 | 3 | 76 | 0 | 2 | -3 | 53% | 19% | 10.3 |
| 2024 W17 | @ | 6 | 5 | 84 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 93% | 20% | 14.1 |
| 2024 W16 | @ | 5 | 3 | 78 | 1 | – | – | 89% | 15% | 16.8 |
| 2024 W15 | vs | 5 | 3 | 41 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 73% | 14% | 9.0 |
| 2024 W14 | vs | 12 | 7 | 59 | 0 | – | – | 83% | 38% | 12.9 |
| 2024 W13 | @ | 7 | 2 | 45 | 0 | – | – | 100% | 20% | 6.5 |
| 2024 W12 | @ | 6 | 5 | 93 | 0 | – | – | 79% | 24% | 14.3 |
| 2024 W11 | vs | 6 | 4 | 58 | 0 | – | – | 88% | 21% | 9.8 |
| 2024 W10 | @ | 9 | 5 | 84 | 2 | – | – | 93% | 39% | 25.4 |
| 2024 W9 | vs | 8 | 5 | 73 | 0 | – | – | 94% | 30% | 12.3 |
| 2024 W8 | @ | 15 | 10 | 143 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 79% | 40% | 22.6 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 24 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 7.3 | WR82 (2.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W6 | SIT | 9.7 | WR84 (2.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W5 | SIT | 9.0 | WR14 (18.1) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W4 | SIT | 9.8 | WR67 (5.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W3 | SIT | 10.8 | WR81 (3.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W2 | SIT | 11.0 | WR52 (8.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W1 | SIT | 10.0 | WR52 (6.7) | ✓ | |
| 2024 W18 | SIT | 11.7 | WR39 (10.3) | ✓ | |
| 2024 W17 | SIT | 11.3 | WR33 (14.1) | ✓ | |
| 2024 W16 | SIT | 11.4 | WR18 (16.8) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade