Loading…
Michael Mayer
TE · LV
SIT
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: projected outside startable range
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
22.0
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs MIA: allows 16.2 PPR/g to TE, rank 4/32 (Soft). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs MIA
contextvs MIA: 2 games, 5.0 PPR avg
Small sample (2 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %95%
Target share19%
Opportunities5
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
98Average
#20 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
112Easy
#4 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
98Average
#20 of 32 · 17 games
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- We ranked every NFL team by under-25 talent: What ...www.espn.com · 2026-07-22
- Better, worse or the same? Examining the Raiders' ...www.espn.com · 2026-07-18
- Re-Grading The 2023 NFL Draftnfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-11
- Which NFL teams have the best -- and worst -- rost...www.espn.com · 2026-07-06
- 2026 Positional Spending Rankings: Tight Endsnfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-06
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs KC | 5 | 3 | 47 | 0 | 95% | 19% | 7.7 |
| 2025 W17 | vs NYG | 10 | 9 | 89 | 0 | 93% | 36% | 17.9 |
| 2025 W16 | @ HOU | 3 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 67% | 14% | 2.0 |
| 2025 W15 | @ PHI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W12 | vs CLE | 1 | 1 | 14 | 0 | 16% | 2% | 2.4 |
| 2025 W11 | vs DAL | 4 | 3 | 13 | 0 | 77% | 10% | 4.3 |
| 2025 W10 | @ DEN | 4 | 3 | 22 | 0 | 62% | 16% | 5.2 |
| 2025 W9 | vs JAX | 7 | 3 | 26 | 0 | 83% | 18% | 5.6 |
| 2025 W7 | @KC | 2 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 94% | 12% | 2.0 |
| 2025 W6 | vs TEN | 7 | 5 | 50 | 1 | 92% | 32% | 16.0 |
| 2025 W3 | @ WSH | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8% | 4% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W2 | vs LAC | 2 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 34% | 5% | 2.9 |
| 2025 W1 | @ NE | 4 | 4 | 38 | 0 | 63% | 12% | 7.8 |
| 2024 W18 | vsLAC | 4 | 4 | 21 | 0 | 80% | 12% | 6.1 |
| 2024 W17 | @ NO | 2 | 1 | 14 | 0 | 75% | 6% | 2.4 |
| 2024 W16 | vsJAX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 61% | 3% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W15 | vs ATL | 2 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 70% | 6% | 2.1 |
| 2024 W14 | @ TB | 9 | 7 | 68 | 0 | 81% | 26% | 13.8 |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim83%hit rate
24 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🟡 0%
of 1 Flex call
🔴 87%
of 23 Sit calls
Based on 24 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | KC | SIT | 5.8 | TE19 (7.7) | ✓ |
| 2025 W17 | NYG | SIT | 3.3 | TE4 (17.9) | ✗ |
| 2025 W16 | HOU | SIT | 3.5 | TE50 (2.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W15 | PHI | SIT | 5.6 | TE93 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W12 | CLE | SIT | 7.0 | TE36 (2.4) | ✓ |
| 2025 W11 | DAL | FLEX | 9.1 | TE33 (4.3) | ✗ |
| 2025 W10 | DEN | SIT | 7.5 | TE27 (5.2) | ✓ |
| 2025 W9 | JAX | SIT | 6.0 | TE33 (5.6) | ✓ |
| 2025 W7 | KC | SIT | 6.1 | TE40 (2.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W6 | TEN | SIT | 4.4 | TE6 (16.0) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade