Loading…
vs ARI: allows 16.9 PPR/g to TE, rank 2/32 (Soft). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W8. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Dak Prescott. 2025 share of pass targets to TE (137/589). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (TE12), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
Small sample (2 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
In red zone work, Prescott had touchdown passes to tight end Jake Ferguson on a shovel pass, a quick throw to Pickens on a slant and a perfectly placed ball to the post that was high enough that only receiver Ryan Flournoy could come down w
source ↗If you are risking it with him, it would be smart to nab Jake Ferguson if he is out there to cover your bases.
source ↗
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W7 | @PHI | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 56% | 4% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W6 | @GB | 3 | 2 | 13 | 0 | – | – | 54% | 6% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W5 | vsTB | 6 | 3 | 19 | 0 | – | – | 83% | 14% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W4 | @HOU | 4 | 3 | 11 | 0 | – | – | 71% | 10% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W3 | vsBAL | 5 | 3 | 23 | 1 | – | – | 69% | 13% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W2 | vsWSH | 4 | 4 | 43 | 2 | – | – | 60% | 13% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W1 | @NYG | 2 | 2 | 6 | 0 | – | – | 76% | 7% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W18 | @NYG | 2 | 1 | 5 | 0 | – | – | 60% | 9% | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 |
| 2025 W17 | @WSH | 2 | 1 | 6 | 1 | – | – | 29% | 6% | 7.6 | 7.1 | 6.6 |
| 2025 W16 | vs LAC | 4 | 3 | 19 | 0 | – | – | 69% | 13% | 4.9 | 3.4 | 1.9 |
| 2025 W15 | vs MIN | 4 | 2 | 16 | 0 | – | – | 71% | 12% | 3.6 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| 2025 W14 | @ DET | 7 | 5 | 58 | 0 | – | – | 80% | 15% | 10.8 | 8.3 | 5.8 |
| 2025 W13 | vs KC | 6 | 5 | 36 | 0 | – | – | 71% | 16% | 8.6 | 6.1 | 3.6 |
| 2025 W12 | vsPHI | 6 | 5 | 60 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 69% | 18% | 11.1 | 8.6 | 6.1 |
| 2025 W11 | @ LV | 5 | 4 | 16 | 1 | – | – | 63% | 17% | 11.6 | 9.6 | 7.6 |
| 2025 W9 | vs ARI | 7 | 5 | 50 | 0 | – | – | 90% | 19% | 8.0 | 5.5 | 3.0 |
| 2025 W8 | @ DEN | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 59% | 3% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W7 | vsWSH | 7 | 7 | 29 | 2 | – | – | 66% | 24% | 21.9 | 18.4 | 14.9 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.