
Why: heavy usage, soft matchup






vs KC: allows 19.1 PPR/g to RB, rank 27/32 (Tough). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Daniel Jones. 2025 share of pass targets to RB (77/521). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (RB5), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
| Game | As | Site | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W12 | @ | 16 | 58 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 8.6 | 7.6 | 6.6 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
For the Bills particularly, whose overall anxiety level will skyrocket when the single-elimination phase arrives, the prospect of the workhorse tailback tapping out due to a legitimate injury (or two) becomes more than enough reason to cons
source ↗For the Bills particularly, whose overall anxiety level will skyrocket when the single-elimination phase arrives, the prospect of the workhorse tailback tapping out due to a legitimate injury (or two) becomes more than enough reason to cons
source ↗| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | vs | 19 | 98 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 23 | 0 | 0% | 14% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W18 | @ | 14 | 26 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 52% | 6% | 5.9 | 4.9 | 3.9 |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 21 | 70 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 14 | 0 | 89% | 21% | 17.4 | 15.9 | 14.4 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 16 | 46 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 33 | 0 | 88% | 8% | 16.9 | 15.4 | 13.9 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 25 | 87 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 14 | 0 | 85% | 15% | 13.1 | 11.6 | 10.1 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 21 | 74 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 74% | 0% | 11.4 | 11.4 | 11.4 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 21 | 85 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 36 | 0 | 98% | 20% | 15.1 | 13.6 | 12.1 |
| 2025 W12 | @ | 16 | 58 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 90% | 10% | 8.6 | 7.6 | 6.6 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 32 | 244 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 42 | 0 | 91% | 12% | 49.6 | 48.1 | 46.6 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 14 | 45 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 79% | 4% | 7.7 | 6.7 | 5.7 |
| 2025 W8 | vs | 12 | 153 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 21 | 1 | 75% | 7% | 37.4 | 36.4 | 35.4 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 16 | 94 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 38 | 0 | 87% | 9% | 34.2 | 32.7 | 31.2 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 21 | 123 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 14 | 0 | 92% | 13% | 23.7 | 21.7 | 19.7 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 17 | 66 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 74% | 13% | 31.6 | 30.1 | 28.6 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 17 | 76 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 20 | 0 | 87% | 16% | 14.6 | 12.1 | 9.6 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 17 | 102 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 79% | 16% | 32.8 | 31.3 | 29.8 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 25 | 165 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 50 | 1 | 93% | 6% | 29.5 | 28.5 | 27.5 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 18 | 71 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 27 | 0 | 71% | 10% | 12.8 | 11.3 | 9.8 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 31 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | START | 15.0 | RB42 (5.9) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W17 | START | 16.4 | RB12 (17.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | START | 15.5 | RB17 (16.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | START | 18.2 | RB19 (13.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | START | 19.2 | RB20 (11.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | START | 20.3 | RB18 (15.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | START | 22.4 | RB28 (8.6) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W10 | START | 20.6 | RB1 (49.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | START | 22.8 | RB28 (7.7) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W8 | START | 21.8 | RB1 (37.4) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade