





vs BAL: allows 35.8 PPR/g to WR, rank 4/32 (Soft). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W8. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Josh Allen. 2025 share of pass targets to WR (270/476). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (WR49), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
Small sample (2 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
Players to keep an eye on in the wide receiver room include: Rookie Skyler Bell continues to miss time, while Khalil Shakir and Keon Coleman did not practice for the first time this camp. One of the biggest came during a two-minute drill, w
source ↗What's next: If Moore is out for the Week 5 matchup at the Rams, Khalil Shakir will get more steady volume as a catch-and-run target for Josh Allen, while Keon Coleman provides big-play ability.
source ↗| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W6 | @ | 6 | 4 | 34 | 1 | – | – | 60% | 20% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W5 | @ | 3 | 3 | 80 | 0 | – | – | 69% | 17% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W4 | vs | 8 | 7 | 82 | 0 | – | – | 76% | 27% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W3 | vs | 3 | 1 | 6 | 0 | – | – | 73% | 12% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W2 | vs | 6 | 3 | 38 | 0 | – | – | 49% | 21% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W1 | @ | 6 | 4 | 50 | 0 | – | – | 53% | 21% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 7 | 6 | 35 | 0 | – | – | 78% | 21% | 9.5 | 6.5 | 3.5 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 5 | 4 | 34 | 0 | – | – | 48% | 28% | 7.4 | 5.4 | 3.4 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 5 | 5 | 65 | 0 | – | – | 69% | 19% | 11.5 | 9.0 | 6.5 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 3 | 2 | 16 | 1 | – | – | 50% | 11% | 9.6 | 8.6 | 7.6 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 4 | 1 | 5 | 0 | – | – | 49% | 17% | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 |
| 2025 W12 | @ | 10 | 8 | 110 | 0 | – | – | 67% | 32% | 17.0 | 13.0 | 9.0 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 3 | 1 | -3 | 0 | – | – | 54% | 10% | 0.7 | 0.2 | -0.3 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 9 | 7 | 58 | 0 | – | – | 66% | 23% | 12.8 | 9.3 | 5.8 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 8 | 7 | 43 | 0 | – | – | 61% | 32% | 11.3 | 7.8 | 4.3 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 7 | 6 | 88 | 1 | – | – | 48% | 30% | 20.8 | 17.8 | 14.8 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 5 | 3 | 33 | 0 | – | – | 60% | 19% | 6.3 | 4.8 | 3.3 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 9 | 6 | 45 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 63% | 30% | 11.0 | 8.0 | 5.0 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.