
Why: limited usage
vs NYJ: allows 14.3 PPR/g to TE, rank 11/32 (Average). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Jordan Love. 2025 share of pass targets to TE (96/452). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (TE66), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W2 | vs | 2 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 3.3 | 2.3 | 1.3 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | @ | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 73% | 10% | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.4 |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 64% | 4% | 1.8 | 1.3 | 0.8 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 1 | 1 | 21 | 0 | 42% | 4% | 3.1 | 2.6 | 2.1 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 51% | 3% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 41% | 5% | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.1 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 36% | 4% | 7.2 | 6.7 | 6.2 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 7 | 5 | 29 | 0 | 60% | 27% | 9.9 | 7.4 | 4.9 |
| 2024 W17 | @ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12% | 3% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 W16 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 W15 | vs | 5 | 5 | 37 | 1 | 26% | 14% | 14.7 | 12.2 | 9.7 |
| 2024 W14 | vs | 2 | 2 | 31 | 0 | 8% | 6% | 5.1 | 4.1 | 3.1 |
| 2024 W13 | @ | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 22% | 9% | 1.3 | 0.8 | 0.3 |
| 2024 W12 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 W11 | vs | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 24% | 3% | 1.6 | 1.1 | 0.6 |
| 2024 W10 | @ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 41% | 4% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 W9 | vs | 2 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 16% | 7% | 2.2 | 1.7 | 1.2 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 25 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 1.7 | TE58 (1.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 1.8 | TE49 (1.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 2.9 | TE80 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 2.2 | TE33 (3.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 4.2 | TE80 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 3.9 | TE55 (1.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 3.1 | TE16 (7.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 4.9 | TE69 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2024 W18 | SIT | 2.8 | TE17 (9.9) | ✓ | |
| 2024 W17 | SIT | 3.4 | TE78 (0.0) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade