Loading…
Evan Engram
TE · DEN
SIT
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: limited usage
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
19.9
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs KC: allows 11.0 PPR/g to TE, rank 25/32 (Tough). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs KC
contextvs KC: 3 games, 8.4 PPR avg (1 as JAX, 2 as DEN)
Small sample (3 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %39%
Target share17%
Opportunities4
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
98Average
#21 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
79Hard
#31 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
98Average
#21 of 32 · 17 games
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- PFF Tight End Rankings: The top 32 players ahead of the 2026 NFL seasonwww.pff.com · 2026-07-22
- Top Free Agent Landing Spots For TE Jonnu Smithnfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-20
- Sean Payton makes it clear Broncos want to keep Ja'Quan McMillian long termwww.nbcsports.com · 2026-07-07
- Which NFL teams have the best -- and worst -- rost...www.espn.com · 2026-07-06
- 2026 Positional Spending Rankings: Tight Endsnfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-06
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs LAC | 4 | 3 | 45 | 0 | – | – | 39% | 17% | 7.5 |
| 2025 W17 | @ KC | 4 | 4 | 21 | 0 | – | – | 31% | 11% | 6.1 |
| 2025 W16 | vs JAX | 4 | 2 | 36 | 0 | – | – | 44% | 9% | 5.6 |
| 2025 W15 | vs GB | 3 | 1 | 12 | 0 | – | – | 28% | 9% | 2.2 |
| 2025 W14 | @ LV | 2 | 2 | 8 | 0 | – | – | 36% | 6% | 2.8 |
| 2025 W13 | @ WSH | 9 | 6 | 79 | 0 | – | – | 54% | 21% | 13.9 |
| 2025 W11 | vsKC | 5 | 4 | 33 | 0 | – | – | 40% | 15% | 7.3 |
| 2025 W10 | vsLV | 5 | 2 | 12 | 0 | – | – | 44% | 19% | 3.2 |
| 2025 W9 | @ HOU | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 51% | 9% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W8 | vs DAL | 4 | 4 | 36 | 0 | – | – | 43% | 15% | 7.6 |
| 2025 W7 | vs NYG | 8 | 5 | 42 | 0 | – | – | 56% | 17% | 9.2 |
| 2025 W6 | @ NYJ | 6 | 5 | 42 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 47% | 23% | 9.9 |
| 2025 W5 | @ PHI | 6 | 4 | 33 | 1 | – | – | 41% | 17% | 13.3 |
| 2025 W4 | vs CIN | 7 | 4 | 29 | 0 | – | – | 43% | 17% | 6.9 |
| 2025 W2 | @ IND | 2 | 1 | 12 | 0 | – | – | 43% | 7% | 2.2 |
| 2025 W1 | vs TEN | 4 | 3 | 21 | 0 | – | – | 34% | 11% | 5.1 |
| 2024 W14 | @TEN | 6 | 4 | 33 | 0 | – | – | 71% | 20% | 7.3 |
| 2024 W13 | vsHOU | 9 | 7 | 41 | 0 | – | – | 71% | 21% | 11.1 |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim60%hit rate
25 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🟢 38%
of 8 Start calls
🟡 25%
of 4 Flex calls
🔴 85%
of 13 Sit calls
Based on 25 graded calls.
Recent calls
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade