Loading…
Austin Hooper
TE · ATL
SIT
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: limited usage
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
19.4
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs PIT: allows 16.6 PPR/g to TE, rank 3/32 (Soft). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs PIT
contextvs PIT: 2 games, 2.4 PPR avg (1 as LV, 1 as NE)
Small sample (2 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %41%
Target share5%
Opportunities1
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
104Easy
#7 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
109Easy
#6 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
104Easy
#7 of 32 · 17 games
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- 2026 Positional Spending Rankings: Tight Endsnfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-06
- NFC Notes: Tua Tagovailoa, Roster Projections, Falcons, Panthersnfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-04
- Ahead of NFL schedule release on Thursday, an updated look at the Panthers' 2026 opponentswww.panthers.com · 2026-05-12
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs MIA | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 41% | 5% | 1.5 |
| 2025 W17 | @ NYJ | 2 | 2 | 11 | 1 | 41% | 8% | 9.1 |
| 2025 W16 | @ BAL | 4 | 2 | 34 | 0 | 31% | 10% | 5.4 |
| 2025 W15 | vs BUF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 31% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W13 | vs NYG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 38% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W12 | @ CIN | 4 | 3 | 39 | 0 | 56% | 12% | 6.9 |
| 2025 W10 | @ TB | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 56% | 3% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W9 | vs ATL | 1 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 53% | 4% | 3.0 |
| 2025 W8 | vs CLE | 2 | 2 | 38 | 0 | 57% | 9% | 5.8 |
| 2025 W7 | @ TEN | 2 | 2 | 11 | 1 | 51% | 8% | 9.1 |
| 2025 W6 | @ NO | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 64% | 4% | 1.5 |
| 2025 W5 | @BUF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 57% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W4 | vs CAR | 1 | 1 | 24 | 0 | 65% | 6% | 3.4 |
| 2025 W3 | vs PIT | 3 | 2 | 28 | 0 | 65% | 8% | 4.8 |
| 2025 W2 | @MIA | 3 | 3 | 38 | 0 | 62% | 13% | 6.8 |
| 2025 W1 | vs LV | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 32% | 2% | 2.0 |
| 2024 W18 | vsBUF | 6 | 4 | 27 | 0 | 67% | 21% | 6.7 |
| 2024 W17 | vs LAC | 3 | 3 | 19 | 0 | 45% | 13% | 4.9 |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim91%hit rate
33 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🔴 91%
of 33 Sit calls
Based on 33 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | MIA | SIT | 3.3 | TE54 (1.5) | ✓ |
| 2025 W17 | NYJ | SIT | 3.5 | TE18 (9.1) | ✓ |
| 2025 W16 | BAL | SIT | 2.7 | TE27 (5.4) | ✓ |
| 2025 W15 | BUF | SIT | 3.3 | TE62 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W13 | NYG | SIT | 4.4 | TE65 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W12 | CIN | SIT | 4.6 | TE21 (6.9) | ✓ |
| 2025 W10 | TB | SIT | 4.4 | TE56 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W9 | ATL | SIT | 3.9 | TE39 (3.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W8 | CLE | SIT | 3.6 | TE22 (5.8) | ✓ |
| 2025 W7 | TEN | SIT | 3.5 | TE20 (9.1) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade