
Why: high-scoring game, soft matchup
vs CAR: allows 23.6 PPR/g to RB, rank 9/32 (Soft). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
| Game | As | Site | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W5 | vs | 21 | 73 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 47 | 0 | 20.0 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs | 10 | 40 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 58% | 7% | 5.8 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 9 | 54 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 25 | 0 | 59% | 8% | 21.9 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 13 | 58 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 55% | 7% | 9.0 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 18 | 98 | 2 | 1 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 56% | 4% | 22.6 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 13 | 63 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 19 | 0 | 57% | 14% | 11.2 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 18 | 125 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 53% | 6% | 20.8 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 8 | 15 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 0 | 45% | 3% | 1.9 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 21 | 90 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 57% | 4% | 9.0 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 13 | 80 | 0 | 8 | 5 | 18 | 0 | 62% | 22% | 14.8 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 11 | 45 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 26 | 0 | 49% | 6% | 15.1 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 19 | 124 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 0 | 54% | 4% | 20.8 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 14 | 108 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 67 | 1 | 56% | 10% | 25.5 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 14 | 38 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 22 | 0 | 66% | 17% | 16.0 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 13 | 33 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 45 | 0 | 61% | 14% | 10.8 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 12 | 63 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 57% | 9% | 13.9 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 17 | 53 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 12 | 0 | 81% | 15% | 9.5 |
| 2024 W18 | @ | 20 | 65 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 79% | 8% | 12.5 |
| 2024 W17 | vs | 12 | 53 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 28 | 0 | 66% | 19% | 12.1 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 33 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | START | 14.1 | RB44 (5.8) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W17 | START | 13.7 | RB8 (21.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | FLEX | 12.5 | RB34 (9.0) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W15 | FLEX | 11.2 | RB7 (22.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | FLEX | 11.3 | RB23 (11.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 10.3 | RB3 (20.8) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W12 | FLEX | 13.6 | RB52 (1.9) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W11 | START | 14.6 | RB31 (9.0) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W10 | START | 15.5 | RB16 (14.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W8 | START | 14.6 | RB15 (15.1) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade