
Why: heavy usage, high-scoring game
vs IND: allows 36.1 PPR/g to WR, rank 2/32 (Soft). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 W3 | vs | 10 | 8 | 48 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 13.0 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
Ravens wide receiver Zay Flowers has played three years in the NFL, which means he’s eligible for a second contract. Lamar Jackson on Zay Flowers' next contract: "His value is out of this world"
source ↗| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | @ | 6 | 4 | 138 | 2 | – | – | 98% | 38% | 29.8 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 5 | 4 | 30 | 1 | – | – | 68% | 25% | 13.0 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 7 | 7 | 84 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 89% | 35% | 21.2 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 5 | 3 | 68 | 1 | – | – | 78% | 42% | 15.8 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 11 | 8 | 124 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 93% | 34% | 20.6 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 7 | 2 | 6 | 0 | – | – | 95% | 23% | 0.6 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 6 | 5 | 58 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 84% | 30% | 11.9 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 5 | 3 | 78 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 89% | 20% | 11.3 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 6 | 4 | 75 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 83% | 21% | 12.1 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 5 | 5 | 64 | 0 | – | – | 82% | 22% | 11.4 |
| 2025 W8 | vs | 9 | 7 | 63 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 95% | 41% | 14.1 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 10 | 6 | 46 | 0 | – | – | 91% | 31% | 8.6 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 5 | 5 | 72 | 0 | – | – | 84% | 25% | 12.2 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 8 | 7 | 74 | 0 | – | – | 89% | 27% | 14.4 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 3 | 2 | 13 | 0 | – | – | 86% | 11% | 3.3 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 11 | 7 | 75 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 79% | 39% | 14.9 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 9 | 7 | 143 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 90% | 47% | 28.1 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 2 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 20% | 7% | 3.1 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 34 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | START | 15.2 | WR1 (29.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | START | 14.1 | WR23 (13.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | START | 14.2 | WR9 (21.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | FLEX | 13.4 | WR20 (15.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | FLEX | 11.5 | WR8 (20.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | FLEX | 12.5 | WR105 (0.6) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W12 | FLEX | 13.1 | WR27 (11.9) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W11 | START | 13.1 | WR23 (11.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | START | 13.6 | WR30 (12.1) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W9 | START | 14.5 | WR32 (11.4) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade