Loading…
vs BUF: allows 26.5 PPR/g to WR, rank 27/32 (Tough). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W8. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Lamar Jackson. 2025 share of pass targets to WR (210/404). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (WR7), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
Small sample (2 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
Ravens wide receiver Zay Flowers has played three years in the NFL, which means he’s eligible for a second contract. Lamar Jackson on Zay Flowers' next contract: "His value is out of this world"
source ↗ET) Fantasy football takeaway: Ravens WR Zay Flowers scored a season-high 25.8 fantasy points this week, but where do we see the wide receiver for Week 5 if QB Lamar Jackson (ankle) is out?
source ↗
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W7 | vsCIN | 11 | 8 | 137 | 1 | – | – | 85% | 32% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W6 | @CLE | 11 | 6 | 66 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 88% | 36% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W5 | @ATL | 9 | 8 | 53 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 82% | 29% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W4 | vsTEN | 10 | 8 | 118 | 1 | – | – | 73% | 35% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W3 | @DAL | 6 | 5 | 84 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 33% | 30% | – | – | – |
| 2026 W1 | @IND | 6 | 5 | 150 | 1 | – | – | 29% | 25% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W18 | @ PIT | 6 | 4 | 138 | 2 | – | – | 98% | 38% | 29.8 | 27.8 | 25.8 |
| 2025 W17 | @ GB | 5 | 4 | 30 | 1 | – | – | 68% | 25% | 13.0 | 11.0 | 9.0 |
| 2025 W16 | vs NE | 7 | 7 | 84 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 89% | 35% | 21.2 | 17.7 | 14.2 |
| 2025 W15 | @CIN | 5 | 3 | 68 | 1 | – | – | 78% | 42% | 15.8 | 14.3 | 12.8 |
| 2025 W14 | vsPIT | 11 | 8 | 124 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 93% | 34% | 20.6 | 16.6 | 12.6 |
| 2025 W13 | vsCIN | 7 | 2 | 6 | 0 | – | – | 95% | 23% | 0.6 | -0.4 | -1.4 |
| 2025 W12 | vs NYJ | 6 | 5 | 58 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 84% | 30% | 11.9 | 9.4 | 6.9 |
| 2025 W11 | @CLE | 5 | 3 | 78 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 89% | 20% | 11.3 | 9.8 | 8.3 |
| 2025 W10 | @ MIN | 6 | 4 | 75 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 83% | 21% | 12.1 | 10.1 | 8.1 |
| 2025 W9 | @ MIA | 5 | 5 | 64 | 0 | – | – | 82% | 22% | 11.4 | 8.9 | 6.4 |
| 2025 W8 | vs CHI | 9 | 7 | 63 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 95% | 41% | 14.1 | 10.6 | 7.1 |
| 2025 W6 | vs LAR | 10 | 6 | 46 | 0 | – | – | 91% | 31% | 8.6 | 5.6 | 2.6 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.