
Why: heavy usage, high-scoring game, soft matchup





vs NO: allows 20.7 PPR/g to RB, rank 20/32 (Average). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Lamar Jackson. 2025 share of pass targets to RB (70/404). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (RB14), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
| Game | As | Site | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 W1 | @ | 15 | 63 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 56 | 0 | 13.9 | 12.9 | 11.9 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | @ | 24 | 144 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 0 | 0% | 4% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W18 | @ | 20 | 126 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 71% | 6% | 12.6 | 12.6 | 12.6 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 36 | 216 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 63% | 0% | 45.6 | 45.6 | 45.6 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 18 | 128 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 44% | 0% | 22.8 | 22.8 | 22.8 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 11 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 37% | 0% | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 25 | 94 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 54% | 6% | 11.2 | 10.7 | 10.2 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 10 | 60 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 44 | 0 | 40% | 3% | 17.4 | 16.9 | 16.4 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 21 | 64 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 24 | 0 | 56% | 10% | 22.8 | 21.8 | 20.8 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 18 | 103 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 54% | 8% | 20.2 | 19.2 | 18.2 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 20 | 75 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 67% | 10% | 11.4 | 9.9 | 8.4 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 19 | 119 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 64% | 4% | 13.1 | 12.6 | 12.1 |
| 2025 W8 | vs | 21 | 71 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 58% | 5% | 19.1 | 19.1 | 19.1 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 24 | 122 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 49% | 6% | 14.0 | 13.5 | 13.0 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 15 | 33 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 65% | 5% | 9.3 | 9.3 | 9.3 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 8 | 42 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 16 | 0 | 40% | 10% | 7.8 | 6.8 | 5.8 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 12 | 50 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 49% | 4% | 10.7 | 10.2 | 9.7 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 11 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 61% | 0% | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 18 | 169 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 57% | 5% | 29.2 | 28.7 | 28.2 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 34 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | START | 16.0 | RB15 (12.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | FLEX | 11.4 | RB1 (45.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | FLEX | 13.0 | RB9 (22.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | START | 15.1 | RB27 (10.0) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W14 | START | 14.6 | RB22 (11.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | START | 16.1 | RB11 (17.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | START | 15.6 | RB5 (22.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | FLEX | 13.7 | RB8 (20.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | START | 14.0 | RB22 (11.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | START | 13.2 | RB14 (13.1) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade