
Why: projected outside startable range
vs CIN: allows 20.9 PPR/g to TE, rank 1/32 (Soft). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer C.J. Stroud. 2025 share of pass targets to TE (130/551). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (TE75), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
No prior games vs CIN in the record.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | vs | 1 | 1 | -2 | 0 | – | – | 0% | 3% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W18 | vs | 2 | 1 | 9 | 0 | – | – | 49% | 7% | 1.9 | 1.4 | 0.9 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 54% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 3 | 2 | 7 | 0 | – | – | 51% | 9% | 2.7 | 1.7 | 0.7 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 3 | 3 | 22 | 0 | – | – | 61% | 12% | 5.2 | 3.7 | 2.2 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 29% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 2 | 2 | 16 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 41% | 6% | 3.9 | 2.9 | 1.9 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 34% | 7% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 20% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 4 | 4 | 22 | 0 | – | – | 57% | 15% | 6.2 | 4.2 | 2.2 |
| 2024 W18 | @ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 60% | 4% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 W17 | vs | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | – | – | 34% | 3% | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.1 |
| 2024 W13 | @ | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | – | – | 59% | 3% | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.4 |
| 2024 W12 | vs | 4 | 3 | 26 | 1 | – | – | 36% | 13% | 11.6 | 10.1 | 8.6 |
| 2024 W11 | @ | 2 | 2 | 15 | 0 | – | – | 45% | 6% | 3.5 | 2.5 | 1.5 |
| 2024 W10 | vs | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | – | – | 43% | 6% | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.2 |
| 2024 W9 | @ | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 44% | 7% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 W8 | vs | 3 | 2 | 19 | 0 | – | – | 48% | 8% | 3.9 | 2.9 | 1.9 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 22 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 3.3 | TE48 (1.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 3.9 | TE86 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 3.7 | TE46 (2.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 2.3 | TE28 (5.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 3.7 | TE81 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 3.2 | TE35 (3.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 2.9 | TE83 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 3.5 | TE82 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W1 | SIT | 3.7 | TE23 (6.2) | ✓ | |
| 2024 W18 | SIT | 3.6 | TE95 (0.0) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade