Loading…
Cade Stover
TE · HOU
SIT
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: tough matchup
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
21.5
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs BUF: allows 7.6 PPR/g to TE, rank 32/32 (Tough). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs BUF
contextvs BUF: 2 games, 1.3 PPR avg
Small sample (2 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %49%
Target share7%
Opportunities2
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
103Easy
#9 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
89Hard
#25 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
103Easy
#9 of 32 · 17 games
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- 2026 Positional Spending Rankings: Tight Endsnfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-06
- AFC Notes: Liam Coen, Laiatu Latu, Colts, Jaguars, Texanswww.yardbarker.com · 2026-06-27
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs IND | 2 | 1 | 9 | 0 | – | – | 49% | 7% | 1.9 |
| 2025 W17 | @ LAC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 54% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W16 | vs LV | 3 | 2 | 7 | 0 | – | – | 51% | 9% | 2.7 |
| 2025 W15 | vs ARI | 3 | 3 | 22 | 0 | – | – | 61% | 12% | 5.2 |
| 2025 W14 | @ KC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 29% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W13 | @IND | 2 | 2 | 16 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 41% | 6% | 3.9 |
| 2025 W12 | vs BUF | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 34% | 7% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W11 | @ TEN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 20% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W1 | @ LAR | 4 | 4 | 22 | 0 | – | – | 57% | 15% | 6.2 |
| 2024 W18 | @TEN | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 60% | 4% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W17 | vs BAL | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | – | – | 34% | 3% | 1.1 |
| 2024 W13 | @ JAX | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | – | – | 59% | 3% | 1.4 |
| 2024 W12 | vsTEN | 4 | 3 | 26 | 1 | – | – | 36% | 13% | 11.6 |
| 2024 W11 | @ DAL | 2 | 2 | 15 | 0 | – | – | 45% | 6% | 3.5 |
| 2024 W10 | vs DET | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | – | – | 43% | 6% | 1.2 |
| 2024 W9 | @ NYJ | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 44% | 7% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W8 | vsIND | 3 | 2 | 19 | 0 | – | – | 48% | 8% | 3.9 |
| 2024 W7 | @ GB | 1 | 1 | 15 | 0 | – | – | 48% | 5% | 2.5 |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim100%hit rate
22 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🔴 100%
of 22 Sit calls
Based on 22 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | IND | SIT | 3.3 | TE48 (1.9) | ✓ |
| 2025 W17 | LAC | SIT | 3.9 | TE86 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W16 | LV | SIT | 3.7 | TE46 (2.7) | ✓ |
| 2025 W15 | ARI | SIT | 2.3 | TE28 (5.2) | ✓ |
| 2025 W14 | KC | SIT | 3.7 | TE81 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W13 | IND | SIT | 3.2 | TE35 (3.9) | ✓ |
| 2025 W12 | BUF | SIT | 2.9 | TE83 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W11 | TEN | SIT | 3.5 | TE82 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W1 | LAR | SIT | 3.7 | TE23 (6.2) | ✓ |
| 2024 W18 | TEN | SIT | 3.6 | TE95 (0.0) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade