
Why: limited usage, tough matchup
vs DAL: allows 24.9 PPR/g to RB, rank 6/32 (Soft). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Marcus Mariota. 2025 share of pass targets to RB (55/426). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (RB38), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
| Game | As | Site | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W16 | @ | 3 | 10 | 0 | 8 | 7 | 50 | 0 | 11.0 | 7.5 | 4.0 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
Rachaad White is gone, and Bucky Irving is projected for 61% of the touches for the Buccaneers, leaving Gainwell with standalone appeal and RB2 upside if his role grows.
source ↗Rachaad White is gone, and Bucky Irving is projected for 61% of the touches for the Buccaneers, leaving Gainwell with standalone appeal and RB2 upside if his role grows.
source ↗| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | @ | 7 | 22 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0% | 7% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W18 | vs | 7 | 23 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 18 | 0 | 33% | 9% | 6.1 | 5.1 | 4.1 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 2 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 48% | 5% | 3.7 | 2.7 | 1.7 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 5 | 45 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 39% | 8% | 8.0 | 7.0 | 6.0 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 1 | 20 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 42% | 3% | 3.6 | 3.1 | 2.6 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 11 | 53 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 49% | 7% | 6.5 | 6.0 | 5.5 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 2 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 22 | 0 | 38% | 12% | 5.9 | 4.4 | 2.9 |
| 2025 W12 | @ | 7 | 38 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 60% | 3% | 5.2 | 4.7 | 4.2 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 10 | 51 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 60% | 11% | 8.2 | 7.2 | 6.2 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 10 | 38 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 16 | 0 | 72% | 12% | 10.4 | 7.9 | 5.4 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 13 | 35 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 26 | 0 | 55% | 8% | 8.1 | 7.1 | 6.1 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 10 | 38 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 90% | 12% | 8.4 | 6.4 | 4.4 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 17 | 65 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 21 | 0 | 77% | 13% | 17.6 | 16.1 | 14.6 |
| 2025 W5 | @ | 14 | 41 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 30 | 0 | 80% | 13% | 23.1 | 21.1 | 19.1 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 6 | 17 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 29 | 0 | 42% | 13% | 8.6 | 6.6 | 4.6 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 5 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 28% | 4% | 2.4 | 1.9 | 1.4 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 10 | 65 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 31% | 6% | 14.6 | 13.6 | 12.6 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 2 | 14 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 24% | 3% | 2.6 | 2.1 | 1.6 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 33 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 8.0 | RB41 (6.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 7.8 | RB49 (3.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 8.4 | RB40 (8.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 9.1 | RB50 (3.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | FLEX | 10.2 | RB39 (6.5) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W13 | FLEX | 11.2 | RB45 (5.9) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W12 | FLEX | 11.5 | RB40 (5.2) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W11 | FLEX | 13.1 | RB36 (8.2) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W10 | START | 15.1 | RB27 (10.4) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W8 | START | 14.8 | RB30 (8.1) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade