
Why: limited usage
vs PHI: allows 22.7 PPR/g to RB, rank 12/32 (Average). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Small sample (3 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
Rachaad White is gone, and Bucky Irving is projected for 61% of the touches for the Buccaneers, leaving Gainwell with standalone appeal and RB2 upside if his role grows.
source ↗| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs | 7 | 23 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 18 | 0 | 33% | 9% | 6.1 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 2 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 48% | 5% | 3.7 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 5 | 45 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 39% | 8% | 8.0 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 1 | 20 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 42% | 3% | 3.6 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 11 | 53 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 49% | 7% | 6.5 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 2 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 22 | 0 | 38% | 12% | 5.9 |
| 2025 W12 | @ | 7 | 38 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 60% | 3% | 5.2 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 10 | 51 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 60% | 11% | 8.2 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 10 | 38 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 16 | 0 | 72% | 12% | 10.4 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 13 | 35 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 26 | 0 | 55% | 8% | 8.1 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 10 | 38 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 90% | 12% | 8.4 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 17 | 65 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 21 | 0 | 77% | 13% | 17.6 |
| 2025 W5 | @ | 14 | 41 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 30 | 0 | 80% | 13% | 23.1 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 6 | 17 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 29 | 0 | 42% | 13% | 8.6 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 5 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 28% | 4% | 2.4 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 10 | 65 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 31% | 6% | 14.6 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 2 | 14 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 24% | 3% | 2.6 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27% | 0% | 0.0 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 33 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 8.0 | RB41 (6.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 7.8 | RB49 (3.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 8.4 | RB40 (8.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 9.1 | RB50 (3.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | FLEX | 10.2 | RB39 (6.5) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W13 | FLEX | 11.2 | RB45 (5.9) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W12 | FLEX | 11.5 | RB40 (5.2) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W11 | FLEX | 13.1 | RB36 (8.2) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W10 | START | 15.1 | RB27 (10.4) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W8 | START | 14.8 | RB30 (8.1) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade