
Why: high-scoring game, soft matchup
vs NYG: allows 25.5 PPR/g to RB, rank 4/32 (Soft). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
| Game | As | Site | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W2 | vs | 18 | 97 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 33 | 0 | 25.0 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W17 | @ | 13 | 54 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27% | 6% | 11.4 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 9 | 34 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 57% | 10% | 6.3 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 15 | 91 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29% | 0% | 15.1 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 17 | 67 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 79% | 9% | 14.7 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 17 | 59 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 21 | 1 | 78% | 8% | 17.0 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 20 | 87 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 78% | 9% | 12.1 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 22 | 93 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 78% | 3% | 10.3 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 15 | 83 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 87% | 3% | 7.3 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 13 | 41 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 72% | 6% | 17.9 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 19 | 116 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 69% | 14% | 18.8 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 13 | 29 | 0 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 85% | 25% | 8.4 |
| 2025 W5 | @ | 16 | 135 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 77% | 7% | 26.9 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 20 | 85 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 15 | 0 | 80% | 8% | 19.0 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 10 | 76 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 16 | 0 | 59% | 11% | 12.2 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 18 | 97 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 33 | 0 | 72% | 14% | 25.0 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 15 | 54 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 77% | 9% | 20.4 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 5 | 28 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 50 | 0 | 31% | 14% | 10.8 |
| 2024 W17 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 37% | 7% | 2.0 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 33 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W17 | START | 14.3 | RB19 (11.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | START | 14.8 | RB45 (6.3) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W15 | START | 15.7 | RB16 (15.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | START | 14.9 | RB17 (14.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | FLEX | 14.6 | RB13 (17.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | START | 14.7 | RB20 (12.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | START | 15.3 | RB26 (10.3) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W9 | START | 17.5 | RB30 (7.3) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W8 | START | 17.1 | RB10 (17.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W7 | START | 16.9 | RB10 (18.8) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade