
Why: OUT · INJ gate
vs CLE: allows 26.0 PPR/g to WR, rank 29/32 (Tough). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Baker Mayfield. 2025 share of pass targets to WR (358/537). Descriptive context, never a model input.
No prior games vs CLE in the record.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
Jalen McMillan and Cade Otton got in on the fun, too. Williams got lost in coverage on the deep touchdown from Mayfield to Jalen McMillan, but Bowles was complimentary of his athleticism and versatility after practice, albeit he did so whil
source ↗With Jalen McMillan out with a knee injury, it was expected that Egbuka’s target share would increase. WR Ted Hurst III With Jalen McMillan out, there might’ve been some thought that rookie wide receiver Ted Hurst III could see increased wo
source ↗| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs | 1 | 1 | 11 | 0 | – | – | 55% | 5% | 2.1 | 1.6 | 1.1 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 9 | 7 | 114 | 0 | – | – | 52% | 21% | 18.4 | 14.9 | 11.4 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 3 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 53% | 12% | 3.6 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 2 | 2 | 38 | 0 | – | – | 46% | 6% | 5.8 | 4.8 | 3.8 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 6 | 5 | 74 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 88% | 19% | 19.0 | 16.5 | 14.0 |
| 2024 W17 | vs | 5 | 5 | 51 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 69% | 16% | 23.0 | 20.5 | 18.0 |
| 2024 W16 | @ | 7 | 5 | 57 | 1 | – | – | 83% | 16% | 16.7 | 14.2 | 11.7 |
| 2024 W15 | @ | 6 | 5 | 75 | 1 | – | – | 64% | 23% | 18.5 | 16.0 | 13.5 |
| 2024 W14 | vs | 7 | 4 | 59 | 2 | – | – | 79% | 25% | 21.9 | 19.9 | 17.9 |
| 2024 W13 | @ | 3 | 2 | 25 | 0 | – | – | 76% | 9% | 4.5 | 3.5 | 2.5 |
| 2024 W12 | @ | 2 | 1 | 11 | 0 | – | – | 63% | 7% | 2.1 | 1.6 | 1.1 |
| 2024 W8 | vs | 7 | 4 | 35 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 81% | 15% | 9.2 | 7.2 | 5.2 |
| 2024 W7 | vs | 8 | 3 | 15 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 60% | 18% | 5.6 | 4.1 | 2.6 |
| 2024 W6 | @ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 18% | 3% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 W3 | vs | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | – | – | 77% | 3% | 1.6 | 1.1 | 0.6 |
| 2024 W2 | @ | 2 | 1 | 21 | 0 | – | – | 79% | 11% | – | – | – |
| 2024 W1 | vs | 3 | 1 | 32 | 1 | – | – | 83% | 10% | – | – | – |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 15 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 9.2 | WR85 (2.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 9.4 | WR10 (18.4) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 10.8 | WR84 (3.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | FLEX | 12.9 | WR62 (5.8) | ✗ | |
| 2024 W18 | FLEX | 13.9 | WR13 (19.0) | ✓ | |
| 2024 W17 | SIT | 12.0 | WR14 (23.0) | ✗ | |
| 2024 W16 | SIT | 9.8 | WR19 (16.7) | ✗ | |
| 2024 W15 | SIT | 8.7 | WR18 (18.5) | ✗ | |
| 2024 W14 | SIT | 8.2 | WR9 (21.9) | ✗ | |
| 2024 W13 | SIT | 7.0 | WR75 (4.5) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade