
Why: limited usage
vs LV: allows 32.8 PPR/g to WR, rank 11/32 (Average). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W11 | @ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | @ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 38% | 5% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 8 | 4 | 31 | 0 | 62% | 23% | 7.1 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18% | 3% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 2 | 2 | 47 | 1 | 19% | 6% | 12.7 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 2 | 1 | 16 | 0 | 49% | 7% | 2.6 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 91% | 3% | 1.8 |
| 2025 W5 | @ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 77% | 4% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 6 | 4 | 61 | 0 | 81% | 16% | 10.1 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 6 | 3 | 24 | 0 | 88% | 14% | 7.4 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 4 | 2 | 16 | 0 | 65% | 8% | 3.6 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 44% | 6% | 1.0 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 6 | 4 | 98 | 0 | 72% | 18% | 13.8 |
| 2024 W17 | @ | 4 | 3 | 30 | 1 | 68% | 14% | 12.0 |
| 2024 W16 | vs | 3 | 2 | 20 | 1 | 28% | 10% | 10.0 |
| 2024 W15 | @ | 2 | 1 | 11 | 1 | 49% | 7% | 8.1 |
| 2024 W14 | vs | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 65% | 10% | 0.0 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 30 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 3.8 | WR127 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 3.0 | WR49 (7.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 3.2 | WR126 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 4.1 | WR122 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 5.1 | WR116 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W8 | SIT | 5.7 | WR28 (12.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W7 | SIT | 7.5 | WR86 (2.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W6 | SIT | 7.3 | WR89 (1.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W5 | SIT | 7.0 | WR113 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W4 | SIT | 7.0 | WR33 (10.1) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade