Loading…
Trey McBride
TE · ARI
START
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: heavy usage
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
17.9
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs LAC: allows 10.5 PPR/g to TE, rank 28/32 (Tough). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs LAC
contextvs LAC: 1 game, 10.1 PPR avg
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W7 |  ARI | vs LAC | 7 | 5 | 51 | 0 | 10.1 |
Swipe for more →
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %95%
Target share29%
Opportunities8
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
97Hard
#25 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
89Hard
#24 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
97Hard
#25 of 32 · 17 games
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
contextout
Tight end Trey McBride made one spectacular catch down the sideline but was ruled out; he stared up at the replay after to see what happened.
source ↗- Garrett, Allen and more: Who made the 'Madden 27' ...www.espn.com · 2026-07-28
- Commanders fire TE coach following DWI chargewww.espn.com · 2026-07-27
- Cade Otton’s Polarizing Playwww.pewterreport.com · 2026-07-27
- NFC Notes: Trey McBride, Tetairoa McMillan, Cardinals, Panthersnfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-27
- Jacoby Brissett, Cardinals Work Out New Contractwww.azcardinals.com · 2026-07-26
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | @ LAR | 8 | 7 | 65 | 0 | 95% | 29% | 13.5 |
| 2025 W17 | @ CIN | 13 | 10 | 76 | 1 | 96% | 37% | 23.6 |
| 2025 W16 | vs ATL | 8 | 4 | 27 | 0 | 96% | 28% | 6.7 |
| 2025 W15 | @ HOU | 13 | 12 | 134 | 2 | 92% | 34% | 37.4 |
| 2025 W14 | vsLAR | 9 | 5 | 58 | 0 | 97% | 21% | 10.8 |
| 2025 W13 | @ TB | 9 | 8 | 82 | 1 | 89% | 24% | 22.2 |
| 2025 W12 | vs JAX | 10 | 9 | 79 | 0 | 88% | 22% | 16.9 |
| 2025 W11 | vs SF | 11 | 10 | 115 | 1 | 89% | 20% | 27.5 |
| 2025 W10 | @ SEA | 13 | 9 | 127 | 1 | 84% | 30% | 27.7 |
| 2025 W9 | @ DAL | 9 | 5 | 55 | 1 | 88% | 31% | 16.5 |
| 2025 W7 | vs GB | 13 | 10 | 74 | 2 | 87% | 38% | 29.4 |
| 2025 W6 | @ IND | 11 | 8 | 72 | 1 | 90% | 28% | 21.2 |
| 2025 W5 | vs TEN | 7 | 5 | 41 | 0 | 90% | 23% | 9.1 |
| 2025 W4 | vsSEA | 11 | 7 | 52 | 0 | 96% | 28% | 12.2 |
| 2025 W3 | @SF | 8 | 5 | 43 | 1 | 88% | 24% | 15.3 |
| 2025 W2 | vs CAR | 7 | 6 | 78 | 0 | 91% | 28% | 13.8 |
| 2025 W1 | @ NO | 9 | 6 | 61 | 0 | 97% | 31% | 12.1 |
| 2024 W18 | vsSF | 11 | 7 | 65 | 1 | 89% | 34% | 19.5 |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim79%hit rate
33 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🟢 79%
of 33 Start calls
Based on 33 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | LAR | START | 15.6 | TE6 (13.5) | ✓ |
| 2025 W17 | CIN | START | 14.9 | TE1 (23.6) | ✓ |
| 2025 W16 | ATL | START | 14.9 | TE20 (6.7) | ✗ |
| 2025 W15 | HOU | START | 13.3 | TE2 (37.4) | ✓ |
| 2025 W14 | LAR | START | 15.0 | TE13 (10.8) | ✗ |
| 2025 W13 | TB | START | 15.1 | TE2 (22.2) | ✓ |
| 2025 W12 | JAX | START | 16.7 | TE2 (16.9) | ✓ |
| 2025 W11 | SF | START | 16.8 | TE1 (27.5) | ✓ |
| 2025 W10 | SEA | START | 15.1 | TE1 (27.7) | ✓ |
| 2025 W9 | DAL | START | 15.0 | TE6 (16.5) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade