
Why: OUT · INJ gate
vs SEA: allows 18.5 PPR/g to RB, rank 29/32 (Tough). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Jacoby Brissett. 2025 share of pass targets to RB (92/520). Descriptive context, never a model input.
Small sample (3 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
-- I know I said this Tuesday too, but Trey Benson looks pretty darn good for having been out so long.
source ↗-- I know I said this Tuesday too, but Trey Benson looks pretty darn good for having been out so long.
source ↗| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W4 | vs | 8 | 35 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 19 | 0 | 55% | 13% | 10.4 | 7.9 | 5.4 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 10 | 42 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 61% | 12% | 8.1 | 6.6 | 5.1 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 3 | 14 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 30 | 0 | 44% | 24% | 8.4 | 6.4 | 4.4 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 8 | 69 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 33% | 3% | 8.5 | 8.0 | 7.5 |
| 2024 W15 | vs | 5 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16% | 0% | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.2 |
| 2024 W14 | vs | 2 | 15 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 14% | 3% | 2.9 | 2.4 | 1.9 |
| 2024 W13 | @ | 3 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16% | 0% | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| 2024 W12 | @ | 4 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16% | 0% | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| 2024 W10 | vs | 10 | 62 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 25 | 0 | 27% | 8% | 10.7 | 9.7 | 8.7 |
| 2024 W9 | vs | 8 | 37 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 0 | 28% | 5% | 12.5 | 12.0 | 11.5 |
| 2024 W8 | @ | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6% | 0% | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 2024 W7 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 W6 | @ | 5 | 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19% | 0% | 2.6 | 2.6 | 2.6 |
| 2024 W4 | vs | 9 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19% | 0% | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| 2024 W3 | vs | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3% | 0% | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 2024 W2 | vs | 11 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 33% | 5% | – | – | – |
| 2024 W1 | @ | 3 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 13% | 3% | – | – | – |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 15 graded calls.
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade