Loading…
Troy Franklin
WR · DEN
SIT
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: limited usage
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
19.9
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs KC: allows 27.9 PPR/g to WR, rank 21/32 (Average). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs KC
contextvs KC: 4 games, 5.8 PPR avg
Small sample (4 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %42%
Target share4%
Opportunities1
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
97Hard
#26 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
95Hard
#24 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
97Hard
#26 of 32 · 17 games
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- We ranked every NFL team by under-25 talent: What ...www.espn.com · 2026-07-22
- Eight new NFL coach-player pairings Solak can't wa...www.espn.com · 2026-07-14
- AFC Notes: Donte Jackson, Bo Nix, Davis Webb, Broncos, Chargersnfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-08
- College Football: Most, least explosive offenses of the last five yearswww.pff.com · 2026-06-29
- 📈 Barnwell ranks the best WR, TE and RB groupswww.espn.com · 2026-06-25
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs LAC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 42% | 4% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W17 | @ KC | 4 | 4 | 17 | 0 | – | – | 38% | 11% | 5.7 |
| 2025 W16 | vs JAX | 5 | 4 | 66 | 0 | – | – | 64% | 11% | 10.6 |
| 2025 W15 | vs GB | 6 | 6 | 85 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 50% | 19% | 20.8 |
| 2025 W14 | @ LV | 4 | 3 | 11 | 0 | – | – | 26% | 12% | 4.1 |
| 2025 W13 | @ WSH | 3 | 2 | 21 | 0 | – | – | 53% | 7% | 4.1 |
| 2025 W11 | vsKC | 8 | 4 | 84 | 0 | – | – | 66% | 24% | 12.4 |
| 2025 W10 | vsLV | 9 | 5 | 40 | 1 | – | – | 74% | 35% | 15.0 |
| 2025 W9 | @ HOU | 10 | 4 | 27 | 0 | 2 | -4 | 79% | 29% | 8.3 |
| 2025 W8 | vs DAL | 8 | 6 | 89 | 2 | – | – | 63% | 30% | 26.9 |
| 2025 W7 | vs NYG | 10 | 3 | 19 | 1 | – | – | 62% | 21% | 12.9 |
| 2025 W6 | @ NYJ | 4 | 3 | 19 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 58% | 15% | 3.1 |
| 2025 W5 | @ PHI | 5 | 3 | 35 | 0 | – | – | 59% | 14% | 8.5 |
| 2025 W4 | vs CIN | 8 | 4 | 55 | 0 | – | – | 58% | 19% | 9.5 |
| 2025 W3 | @LAC | 4 | 2 | 8 | 0 | – | – | 79% | 17% | 2.8 |
| 2025 W2 | @ IND | 9 | 8 | 89 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 83% | 30% | 24.0 |
| 2025 W1 | vs TEN | 6 | 4 | 44 | 0 | – | – | 59% | 17% | 8.4 |
| 2024 W18 | vsKC | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 | – | – | 35% | 7% | 3.2 |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim77%hit rate
31 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🟢 50%
of 2 Start calls
🟡 25%
of 4 Flex calls
🔴 88%
of 25 Sit calls
Based on 31 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | LAC | SIT | 8.3 | WR139 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W17 | KC | SIT | 8.1 | WR55 (5.7) | ✓ |
| 2025 W16 | JAX | SIT | 8.9 | WR32 (10.6) | ✓ |
| 2025 W15 | GB | SIT | 9.0 | WR8 (20.8) | ✗ |
| 2025 W14 | LV | FLEX | 11.5 | WR63 (4.1) | ✗ |
| 2025 W13 | WSH | START | 14.4 | WR74 (4.1) | ✗ |
| 2025 W11 | KC | START | 13.9 | WR20 (12.4) | ✓ |
| 2025 W10 | LV | FLEX | 12.5 | WR22 (15.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W9 | HOU | SIT | 10.5 | WR48 (8.3) | ✓ |
| 2025 W8 | DAL | SIT | 9.9 | WR1 (26.9) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade