
Why: projected outside startable range
vs NYJ: allows 20.9 PPR/g to QB, rank 2/32 (Soft). Trailing QB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
| Game | As | Site | C/A | Pass | PaTD | INT | RuYd | RuTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W2 | vs | 19/28 | 192 | 1 | 1 | 38 | 0 | 11.5 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
QBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
Since 2016, Hopkins’ starting quarterbacks have been: - Deshaun Watson - Kyler Murray - Ryan Tannehill - Will Levis - Patrick Mahomes (Hopkins was traded to the Chiefs midseason after starting 2024 with Levis and the Titans) - Lamar Jackson
source ↗| Week | Opp | C/A | Pass | PaTD | INT | RuYd | RuTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W18 | vs | 9/17 | 175 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 11.8 |
| 2024 W15 | vs | 8/12 | 89 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | -4.4 |
| 2024 W14 | vs | 19/32 | 168 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 7.0 |
| 2024 W13 | @ | 18/37 | 212 | 2 | 0 | -3 | 0 | 16.2 |
| 2024 W12 | @ | 18/24 | 278 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 16.1 |
| 2024 W11 | vs | 17/31 | 295 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 0 | 15.6 |
| 2024 W10 | @ | 18/23 | 175 | 2 | 0 | 41 | 0 | 19.1 |
| 2024 W6 | vs | 16/27 | 95 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 7.3 |
| 2024 W4 | @ | 3/4 | 25 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 2024 W3 | vs | 26/34 | 260 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 13.6 |
| 2024 W2 | vs | 19/28 | 192 | 1 | 1 | 38 | 0 | 11.5 |
| 2024 W1 | @ | 19/32 | 127 | 1 | 2 | 36 | 0 | 6.7 |
| 2023 W17 | @ | 2/6 | 16 | 0 | 0 | – | – | – |
| 2023 W15 | vs | 17/26 | 199 | 0 | 1 | 25 | 1 | – |
| 2023 W14 | @ | 23/38 | 327 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 0 | – |
| 2023 W13 | vs | 16/33 | 224 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | – |
| 2023 W12 | vs | 18/28 | 185 | 0 | 0 | -3 | 0 | – |
| 2023 W11 | @ | 13/17 | 158 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | – |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 12 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W18 | SIT | 11.7 | QB19 (11.8) | ✓ | |
| 2024 W15 | SIT | 14.9 | QB44 (-4.4) | ✓ | |
| 2024 W14 | FLEX | 16.6 | QB24 (7.0) | ✗ | |
| 2024 W13 | SIT | 15.2 | QB19 (16.2) | ✓ | |
| 2024 W12 | SIT | 10.9 | QB13 (16.1) | ✓ | |
| 2024 W11 | SIT | 10.8 | QB23 (15.6) | ✓ | |
| 2024 W10 | SIT | 9.7 | QB8 (19.1) | ✗ | |
| 2024 W6 | SIT | 11.6 | QB25 (7.3) | ✓ | |
| 2024 W4 | SIT | 10.2 | QB36 (-0.5) | ✓ | |
| 2024 W3 | SIT | 11.0 | QB20 (13.6) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade