Loading…
Rashid Shaheed
WR · SEA
SIT
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: limited usage
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
24.2
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs NE: allows 28.7 PPR/g to WR, rank 20/32 (Average). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs NE
contextvs NE: 2 games, 5.8 PPR avg
Small sample (2 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %48%
Target share4%
Opportunities1
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
103Easy
#8 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
94Hard
#26 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
103Easy
#8 of 32 · 17 games
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- The six late-round draft fliers to know: Tyler Sho...www.espn.com · 2026-07-28
- Mock draft: Non-PPR formats are a throwback to run...www.espn.com · 2026-07-20
- Mock draft: 12-team league can shift your quarterb...www.espn.com · 2026-07-13
- Better, worse or the same? Examining the Seahawks'...www.espn.com · 2026-07-11
- Which NFL teams have the best -- and worst -- rost...www.espn.com · 2026-07-06
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | @ SF | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | – | – | 48% | 4% | 1.2 |
| 2025 W17 | @ CAR | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | – | – | 18% | 4% | 1.8 |
| 2025 W16 | vs LAR | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 31 | 54% | 3% | 3.1 |
| 2025 W15 | vs IND | 7 | 5 | 74 | 0 | 1 | -3 | 68% | 22% | 12.1 |
| 2025 W14 | @ ATL | 5 | 4 | 67 | 0 | – | – | 51% | 17% | 10.7 |
| 2025 W13 | vs MIN | 3 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 48% | 13% | 2.6 |
| 2025 W12 | @ TEN | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 56% | 8% | 0.5 |
| 2025 W11 | @LAR | 5 | 2 | 27 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 54% | 12% | 4.9 |
| 2025 W10 | vs ARI | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 20 | 34% | 8% | 3.3 |
| 2025 W9 | @LAR | 9 | 5 | 68 | 0 | – | – | 83% | 38% | 11.8 |
| 2025 W8 | vs TB | 12 | 9 | 75 | 0 | – | – | 78% | 24% | 14.5 |
| 2025 W7 | @ CHI | 9 | 4 | 40 | 0 | – | – | 77% | 29% | 8.0 |
| 2025 W6 | vs NE | 6 | 4 | 28 | 0 | – | – | 61% | 23% | 6.8 |
| 2025 W5 | vs NYG | 5 | 4 | 114 | 1 | – | – | 67% | 16% | 21.4 |
| 2025 W4 | @ BUF | 5 | 4 | 47 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 70% | 20% | 9.2 |
| 2025 W3 | @ SEA | 6 | 4 | 42 | 0 | – | – | 74% | 15% | 8.2 |
| 2025 W2 | vsSF | 5 | 4 | 52 | 1 | – | – | 70% | 15% | 15.2 |
| 2025 W1 | vsARI | 9 | 6 | 33 | 0 | – | – | 85% | 22% | 9.3 |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim63%hit rate
24 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🟡 33%
of 9 Flex calls
🔴 80%
of 15 Sit calls
Based on 24 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SF | SIT | 6.9 | WR100 (1.2) | ✓ |
| 2025 W17 | CAR | SIT | 7.7 | WR97 (1.8) | ✓ |
| 2025 W16 | LAR | SIT | 7.6 | WR87 (3.1) | ✓ |
| 2025 W15 | IND | SIT | 7.0 | WR29 (12.1) | ✓ |
| 2025 W14 | ATL | SIT | 5.7 | WR27 (10.7) | ✓ |
| 2025 W13 | MIN | SIT | 8.2 | WR83 (2.6) | ✓ |
| 2025 W12 | TEN | FLEX | 10.6 | WR95 (0.5) | ✗ |
| 2025 W11 | LAR | FLEX | 11.5 | WR62 (4.9) | ✗ |
| 2025 W10 | ARI | FLEX | 13.0 | WR67 (3.3) | ✗ |
| 2025 W9 | LAR | FLEX | 11.2 | WR31 (11.8) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade