
Why: limited usage, tough matchup
vs NYG: allows 33.4 PPR/g to WR, rank 9/32 (Soft). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Matthew Stafford. 2025 share of pass targets to WR (364/578). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (WR127), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
No prior games vs NYG in the record.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | vs | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | – | – | 41% | 4% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W18 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 0% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 20% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 1 | 1 | 19 | 0 | – | – | 16% | 2% | 2.9 | 2.4 | 1.9 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 6% | 3% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | – | – | 17% | 3% | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 35% | 4% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 3 | 3 | 17 | 0 | – | – | 61% | 9% | 4.7 | 3.2 | 1.7 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | – | – | 49% | 4% | 1.9 | 1.4 | 0.9 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 10% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 44% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 4 | 2 | 9 | 0 | – | – | 60% | 12% | 2.9 | 1.9 | 0.9 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 4 | 3 | 23 | 0 | – | – | 92% | 15% | 5.3 | 3.8 | 2.3 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 3 | 2 | 33 | 0 | – | – | 40% | 7% | 5.3 | 4.3 | 3.3 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | – | – | 80% | 3% | 1.7 | 1.2 | 0.7 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 3 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 50% | 9% | 3.4 | 2.4 | 1.4 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 2 | 2 | 42 | 0 | – | – | 64% | 6% | 6.2 | 5.2 | 4.2 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 50% | 0% | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 30 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 2.4 | WR142 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 2.5 | WR150 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 2.5 | WR90 (2.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 4.1 | WR148 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 3.6 | WR92 (1.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 3.3 | WR145 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 3.5 | WR58 (4.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 4.5 | WR91 (1.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 5.7 | WR129 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 6.5 | WR132 (0.0) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade