
Why: limited usage
vs WSH: allows 15.9 PPR/g to TE, rank 5/32 (Soft). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Dak Prescott. 2025 share of pass targets to TE (137/589). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (TE72), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
Small sample (4 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
The Cowboys have agreed to terms with backup tight end Brevyn Spann-Ford on a three-year extension, his agent, Mike McCartney, announced on social media. Cowboys agree to three-year extension with TE Brevyn Spann-Ford
source ↗| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | @ | 2 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 0% | 7% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W18 | @ | 3 | 2 | 30 | 0 | 31% | 14% | 5.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 2 | 1 | 31 | 0 | 52% | 6% | 4.1 | 3.6 | 3.1 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30% | 3% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 16% | 2% | 1.7 | 1.2 | 0.7 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 26% | 3% | 7.4 | 6.9 | 6.4 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 36% | 3% | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.4 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 31% | 3% | 1.9 | 1.4 | 0.9 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 18% | 3% | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.2 |
| 2025 W5 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 12% | 2% | 1.3 | 0.8 | 0.3 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16% | 3% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 32 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 1.9 | TE32 (5.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 1.3 | TE33 (4.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 1.8 | TE81 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 1.9 | TE81 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 1.6 | TE51 (1.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 2.0 | TE81 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 1.2 | TE19 (7.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 1.2 | TE50 (1.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 1.4 | TE72 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W8 | SIT | 1.0 | TE42 (1.9) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade