Loading…
Brevyn Spann-Ford
TE · DAL
SIT
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: limited usage, tough matchup
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
25.5
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs NYG: allows 11.3 PPR/g to TE, rank 24/32 (Tough). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs NYG
contextvs NYG: 4 games, 1.6 PPR avg
Small sample (4 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %31%
Target share14%
Opportunities3
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
101Average
#12 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
98Average
#19 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
101Average
#12 of 32 · 17 games
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- 2026 Positional Spending Rankings: Tight Endsnfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-06
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | @ NYG | 3 | 2 | 30 | 0 | 31% | 14% | 5.0 |
| 2025 W17 | @ WSH | 2 | 1 | 31 | 0 | 52% | 6% | 4.1 |
| 2025 W16 | vs LAC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W15 | vs MIN | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30% | 3% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W14 | @ DET | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 16% | 2% | 1.7 |
| 2025 W13 | vs KC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W12 | vs PHI | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 26% | 3% | 7.4 |
| 2025 W11 | @ LV | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 36% | 3% | 1.4 |
| 2025 W9 | vs ARI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W8 | @ DEN | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 31% | 3% | 1.9 |
| 2025 W7 | vsWSH | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W6 | @ CAR | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 18% | 3% | 1.2 |
| 2025 W5 | @ NYJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W4 | vs GB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W3 | @ CHI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W2 | vsNYG | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 12% | 2% | 1.3 |
| 2025 W1 | @PHI | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16% | 3% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W18 | vsWSH | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26% | 0% | 0.0 |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim100%hit rate
32 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🔴 100%
of 32 Sit calls
Based on 32 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | NYG | SIT | 1.9 | TE32 (5.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W17 | WSH | SIT | 1.3 | TE33 (4.1) | ✓ |
| 2025 W16 | LAC | SIT | 1.8 | TE81 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W15 | MIN | SIT | 1.9 | TE81 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W14 | DET | SIT | 1.6 | TE51 (1.7) | ✓ |
| 2025 W13 | KC | SIT | 2.0 | TE81 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W12 | PHI | SIT | 1.2 | TE19 (7.4) | ✓ |
| 2025 W11 | LV | SIT | 1.2 | TE50 (1.4) | ✓ |
| 2025 W9 | ARI | SIT | 1.4 | TE72 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W8 | DEN | SIT | 1.0 | TE42 (1.9) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade