Loading…
Tre Tucker
WR · LV
SIT
upcoming
2026 Week 1
Why: projected outside startable range
OFFSEASON2026 Wk 1
Matchup & environment
contextImplied team total
22.0
Vegas-implied points (game environment)
vs MIA: allows 29.4 PPR/g to WR, rank 19/32 (Average). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
History vs MIA
contextvs MIA: 2 games, 5.8 PPR avg
Small sample (2 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Usage & opportunity trends
contextSnap %98%
Target share23%
Opportunities7
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
Schedule strength (SOS)
contextRest of season
95Hard
#32 of 32 · 17 games
Fantasy playoffs
101Average
#14 of 32 · 3 games
Full season
95Hard
#32 of 32 · 17 games
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
News & availability
context- The six late-round draft fliers to know: Tyler Sho...www.espn.com · 2026-07-28
- We ranked every NFL team by under-25 talent: What ...www.espn.com · 2026-07-22
- 2026 Fantasy Football: Late-round sleepers to target in draftswww.pff.com · 2026-07-21
- Potential Trade Destinations For Patriots WR Kayshon Bouttenfltraderumors.co · 2026-07-19
- Better, worse or the same? Examining the Raiders' ...www.espn.com · 2026-07-18
Game log
context| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs KC | 6 | 2 | 30 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 98% | 23% | 5.4 |
| 2025 W17 | vs NYG | 6 | 5 | 49 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 100% | 21% | 9.9 |
| 2025 W16 | @ HOU | 5 | 4 | 43 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 100% | 23% | 9.4 |
| 2025 W15 | @ PHI | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 93% | 12% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W14 | vs DEN | 5 | 2 | 24 | 0 | – | – | 94% | 18% | 4.4 |
| 2025 W13 | @ LAC | 3 | 3 | 20 | 0 | – | – | 96% | 14% | 5.0 |
| 2025 W12 | vs CLE | 10 | 3 | 28 | 0 | – | – | 95% | 24% | 5.8 |
| 2025 W11 | vs DAL | 8 | 4 | 47 | 1 | – | – | 97% | 21% | 14.7 |
| 2025 W10 | @DEN | 3 | 2 | 28 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 100% | 12% | 5.5 |
| 2025 W9 | vs JAX | 4 | 3 | 38 | 0 | – | – | 97% | 11% | 6.8 |
| 2025 W7 | @KC | 6 | 5 | 33 | 0 | – | – | 89% | 35% | 8.3 |
| 2025 W6 | vs TEN | 5 | 5 | 70 | 0 | – | – | 92% | 23% | 12.0 |
| 2025 W5 | @ IND | 6 | 4 | 62 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 88% | 17% | 11.1 |
| 2025 W4 | vs CHI | 2 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 98% | 10% | 4.2 |
| 2025 W3 | @ WSH | 9 | 8 | 145 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 94% | 33% | 40.9 |
| 2025 W2 | vsLAC | 8 | 3 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 91% | 19% | 4.9 |
| 2025 W1 | @ NE | 3 | 2 | 54 | 1 | – | – | 90% | 9% | 13.4 |
| 2024 W18 | vsLAC | 4 | 3 | 24 | 0 | – | – | 80% | 12% | 5.4 |
Swipe for more →
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Full history
Loading full history…
Accuracy
our claim74%hit rate
34 graded calls
Hit rate by call type
🟡 0%
of 4 Flex calls
🔴 83%
of 30 Sit calls
Based on 34 graded calls.
Recent calls
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | KC | SIT | 8.9 | WR53 (5.4) | ✓ |
| 2025 W17 | NYG | SIT | 8.2 | WR36 (9.9) | ✓ |
| 2025 W16 | HOU | SIT | 7.5 | WR40 (9.4) | ✓ |
| 2025 W15 | PHI | SIT | 9.2 | WR141 (0.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W14 | DEN | SIT | 9.4 | WR58 (4.4) | ✓ |
| 2025 W13 | LAC | SIT | 9.5 | WR64 (5.0) | ✓ |
| 2025 W12 | CLE | SIT | 10.1 | WR51 (5.8) | ✓ |
| 2025 W11 | DAL | SIT | 10.1 | WR16 (14.7) | ✗ |
| 2025 W10 | DEN | SIT | 10.1 | WR52 (5.5) | ✓ |
| 2025 W9 | JAX | SIT | 10.4 | WR52 (6.8) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade