
Why: projected outside startable range
vs DAL: allows 12.3 PPR/g to TE, rank 20/32 (Average). Trailing TE PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W3 | @ | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1.4 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
TEschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
Isaiah Likely, New York Giants Following an impressive four seasons as essentially the Ravens’ No. Theo Johnson, New York Giants With Isaiah Likely joining the Giants, Johnson will likely get demoted to being New York’s No.
source ↗| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | @ | 2 | 2 | 32 | 0 | 49% | 13% | 5.2 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 3 | 3 | 27 | 0 | 70% | 15% | 5.7 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 51% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 6 | 4 | 25 | 1 | 60% | 19% | 12.5 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 6 | 5 | 95 | 0 | 52% | 20% | 12.5 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 3 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 57% | 15% | 2.0 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 3 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 52% | 12% | 3.5 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 5 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 56% | 17% | 3.7 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 4 | 3 | 60 | 0 | 59% | 17% | 9.0 |
| 2025 W8 | vs | 2 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 58% | 9% | 2.8 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 2 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 81% | 6% | 2.6 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 1 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 53% | 5% | 2.2 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 47% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 5 | 3 | 38 | 0 | 61% | 17% | 6.8 |
| 2024 W17 | @ | 1 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 76% | 6% | 7.9 |
| 2024 W16 | vs | 3 | 3 | 29 | 1 | 66% | 13% | 11.9 |
| 2024 W15 | @ | 2 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 66% | 8% | 3.7 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 30 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 4.9 | TE31 (5.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 5.2 | TE29 (5.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 6.8 | TE83 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 8.0 | TE83 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 7.1 | TE10 (12.5) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 7.1 | TE10 (12.5) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 6.5 | TE40 (2.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 6.1 | TE35 (3.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 5.3 | TE31 (3.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 3.8 | TE21 (9.0) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade