
Why: limited usage
vs MIN: allows 23.6 PPR/g to WR, rank 32/32 (Tough). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Small sample (5 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | @ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 25% | 10% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 3 | 1 | 34 | 0 | – | – | 36% | 12% | 4.4 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 1% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 14% | 3% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 2 | 1 | 45 | 1 | – | – | 17% | 9% | 11.5 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 17% | 3% | 1.5 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 2% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 4% | 0% | 1.7 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 5 | 2 | 28 | 0 | – | – | 38% | 15% | 4.8 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 3% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 2% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 0% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2% | 0% | 0.3 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 0% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 5% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 0% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 40% | 0% | 0.1 |
| 2024 W17 | @ | 4 | 3 | 18 | 0 | – | – | 25% | 14% | 4.8 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 33 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 2.1 | WR128 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 2.3 | WR72 (4.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 2.5 | WR135 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 2.3 | WR129 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 3.0 | WR24 (11.5) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 2.1 | WR97 (1.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 2.3 | WR112 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 2.1 | WR94 (1.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 0.4 | WR59 (4.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 0.9 | WR118 (0.0) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade