
Why: limited usage, tough matchup
vs NYJ: allows 27.7 PPR/g to RB, rank 2/32 (Soft). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Jordan Love. 2025 share of pass targets to RB (78/452). Descriptive context, never a model input.
| Game | As | Site | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 W17 | vs | 4 | 29 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W17 | vs | 5 | 33 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 15 | 0 | 35% | 12% | 7.8 | 6.3 | 4.8 |
| 2024 W16 | @ | 2 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 20% | 7% | 2.9 | 1.9 | 0.9 |
| 2024 W15 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 W14 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 10% | 5% | 2.9 | 1.9 | 0.9 |
| 2024 W13 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 W12 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 W11 | @ | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10% | 0% | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| 2024 W9 | vs | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15% | 0% | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 2024 W8 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 20% | 2% | 1.3 | 0.8 | 0.3 |
| 2024 W7 | vs | 3 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 50% | 6% | 2.5 | 2.0 | 1.5 |
| 2024 W6 | @ | 8 | 43 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 35 | 0 | 53% | 13% | 9.8 | 8.8 | 7.8 |
| 2024 W5 | @ | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8% | 4% | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| 2024 W2 | @ | 1 | -5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 14% | 6% | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 |
| 2024 W1 | vs | 2 | 10 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 24% | 7% | 5.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| 2023 W18 | @ | 14 | 65 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 51% | 4% | – | – | – |
| 2023 W17 | vs | 4 | 29 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23% | 0% | – | – | – |
| 2023 W16 | @ | 5 | 22 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16% | 2% | – | – | – |
| 2023 W15 | vs | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 17% | 5% | – | – | – |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 14 graded calls.
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade